who has deskstar gxp 75 dtla-307060 electronics?

[Ren]

Folkert Rienstra wrote: [...]
Let's try to be positive on the subject at hand.

Sounds like you are in the wrong post, mate.


Cheerio.

Oops, I thought that this group was about hardware & storage. Please
tell me where I could find more knowledgeable people then.

qYou are in the right group. Folkert is just the resident agressive

(but not very bright)

Yes, he isn't, isn't he.

Last time he wasn't very bright he had the audacity to comment on how bright
you were when you said that Windows couldn't boot from USB because Win-
dows would need the driver to be able to access the USB device and that it
couldn't because the driver was on the USB device 'that it couldn't get to'.

How stupid can one be, right Arnie?

So Arnie, in your utter brilliancy, if you change USB to IDE (or SCSI),
how then does Windows manage to boot from IDE if it needs the driver to
access it and that driver is on the IDE? It boggles the mind, aint it, Arnie?

attack dog that tries to dominate what is being said here, like it was
his turf.

What Arnie means here is that he should be able to bullshit here -all to
his heart's content- without someone telling him that he is full of shit.

Ignore him.

Just like you do here, Arnie?

I have him in my killfile for quite some time now (years, I think) and
this group is far more pleasent without him.

Typical Arnie the Swiss ostrich.
Anyone who catches Arnie the babblehead on his usual brightness goes
into Arnie's killfile.

Still so bright that he is always responding to Roddles
though Rod Speed has been in his killfile for far longer.

Arno

Here is some more of Arnie's usual brightness:

"Hehe, that would be 480Mb/s, not 480MB/s. And that is the maximum
theoretical interface bandwidth of USB2.0.

The card will be much slower and if the card is *really, really fast*,
I would be surprised if you get much more than 15MB/s (=120Mb/s)
from the card. "

So Arnie, if 15MB/s is the top for a *really, really fast* USB card what
in your expert opinion is the top for a *slow* or *average* USB 2.0 card?

" Of course the reader cannot deliver data faster than the card...."

"Example: Many people see marketing claimes of 3MB/s for SATA II drives."

"First SATAII supports 3Mb/s (thats 12.5% of 3MB/s).
Second, that is what the interface supports, not the drive."

Arnie at his best when he is fully tanked up.

"In practice you get something like 60MB/s at the beginning of the drive and 30MB/s at its end."
"But if marketing would put these numbers on the drive, people would buy the "faster ones"."

Briljant, isn't it. Don't you love a good Arnie riddle?

Or this one:
" Is there any method to check - hard disk/cdrom/rev disk physical sector size.
Devices that have the capability of showing extra info and then go lie about it.
Who would ever figure that. Apparently everything is possible in Arnie world.

 

[Odie]

Folkert Rienstra wrote:
Folkert Rienstra wrote: [...]
Let's try to be positive on the subject at hand.

Sounds like you are in the wrong post, mate.


Cheerio.

Oops, I thought that this group was about hardware & storage. Please
tell me where I could find more knowledgeable people then.

qYou are in the right group. Folkert is just the resident agressive

(but not very bright)

Yes, he isn't, isn't he.

Actually, and I hate to concede, he *is* rather bright.

He just lacks certain social skills that the rest of us take for
granted.


Odie

 

[John Turco]

Folkert Rienstra wrote:
Folkert Rienstra wrote:
[...]
Let's try to be positive on the subject at hand.

Sounds like you are in the wrong post, mate.


Cheerio.

Oops, I thought that this group was about hardware & storage. Please
tell me where I could find more knowledgeable people then.

qYou are in the right group. Folkert is just the resident agressive

(but not very bright)

Yes, he isn't, isn't he.

Actually, and I hate to concede, he *is* rather bright.

He just lacks certain social skills that the rest of us take for
granted.

Odie

Hello, Odie:

I hate to break it to you, but, "Ren" >is< Folkert Rienstra! Using a
different name was his way of avoiding Arno Wagner's killfile -- which
happens to be Rod Speed's familiar trick, as well. :-J


Cordially,
John Turco <[email protected]>

 

[Arno Wagner]

Folkert Rienstra wrote:
Folkert Rienstra wrote:
[...]
Let's try to be positive on the subject at hand.

Sounds like you are in the wrong post, mate.


Cheerio.

Oops, I thought that this group was about hardware & storage. Please
tell me where I could find more knowledgeable people then.

qYou are in the right group. Folkert is just the resident agressive

(but not very bright)

Yes, he isn't, isn't he.

Actually, and I hate to concede, he *is* rather bright.

He just lacks certain social skills that the rest of us take for
granted.

Odie

Hello, Odie:

I hate to break it to you, but, "Ren" >is< Folkert Rienstra! Using a
different name was his way of avoiding Arno Wagner's killfile -- which
happens to be Rod Speed's familiar trick, as well. :-J

I noticed. Apparently what I say is still not too much to his liking.

If it weren't so much effort to program, I think these two would
be quite simple to identify by their language.

Arno

 

[Stimpy]

Ren wrote:
Folkert Rienstra wrote:
Folkert Rienstra wrote:
[...]
Let's try to be positive on the subject at hand.

Sounds like you are in the wrong post, mate.


Cheerio.

Oops, I thought that this group was about hardware & storage.
Please tell me where I could find more knowledgeable people then.

qYou are in the right group. Folkert is just the resident agressive

(but not very bright)

Yes, he isn't, isn't he.

Actually, and I hate to concede, he *is* rather bright.

Ouch. That must have hurt.
And what a letdown for your friend the babblehead.

Odd choice of words.

And you had to spoil my test.

-- which happens to be Rod Speed's familiar trick, as well. :-J

I noticed.

After you're told.

Apparently what I say is still not too much to his liking.

Still you respond to his sockpuppets, even when he lays it on like a ton of
bricks that it is *him* but never to him directly when he is using his own
name.

If it weren't so much effort to program, I think these two would
be quite simple to identify by their language.

Yet that's what you will have to do and rely on since you obviously
can't control yourself, you just have an uncontrolable urge to babble.

Being confronted by all your bullshit you just can't handle as is whitnes-
sed by the fact that you never ever read your own message back before
sending, scared shitless that you would not dare send it anymore if you did.

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] John Turco typed:

I hate to break it to you, but, "Ren" >is< Folkert Rienstra! Using a
different name was his way of avoiding Arno Wagner's killfile -- which
happens to be Rod Speed's familiar trick, as well. :-J

Hi John, have You ever heard on "quoting levels"? Level 7 used ;-(
Please do only specify on what You tend to answer!
Horst

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] Arno Wagner typed:
Hi Arno, why did You referred to the others on quoting level 8,
when You only want to reply to Odie?
Horst

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] Stimpy typed:

And you had to spoil my test.

Hi Stimpy and whom did You want to answer by quoting level of 9?
Horst

 

[Rod Speed]

In news:[email protected] John Turco typed:

Hi John, have You ever heard on "quoting levels"? Level 7 used ;-(
Please do only specify on what You tend to answer!

Get stuffed. Some of us perfer to have the context in the post.

You get to like that or lump it.

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] Rod Speed typed:

Get stuffed. Some of us perfer to have the context in the post.

Hi Rod, that's rubbish. ALL postings are in this NG!
No need to save a personal copy!
Please relook the usenet rules!
Horst.

 

[Rod Speed]

Rod Speed wrote

Hi Rod, that's rubbish.

It clearly isnt on what we prefer.

ALL postings are in this NG!

You dont know that with other news servers than the one you are using.

No need to save a personal copy!

You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever.

Please relook the usenet rules!

No such animal. Usenet is a close to
pure anarchy as you or I will ever see.

You get to like that or lump that too.

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] Rod Speed typed:

It clearly isnt on what we prefer.
You dont know that with other news servers than the one you are using.

Hi Rod, never mind!
ALL news reader are able to see actual postings.
And there's no need to save personal copies while they are available
via the news server.
Usenet rules specifies wow to use news server postings.

You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever.

This is again not understandable slang for me.
Sorry but every news-reader I know is able to copy the news from
the server on the local disk.

No such animal. Usenet is a close to
pure anarchy as you or I will ever see.

Oh no. Some rules are required for intercommunication!
You would never be happy if I talk in German and You in
English!

You get to like that or lump that too.

What is "lump"?
Horst

 

[John Turco]

In news:[email protected] John Turco typed:

Hi John, have You ever heard on "quoting levels"? Level 7 used ;-(
Please do only specify on what You tend to answer!
Horst

Hello, Horst:

I do edit my replies, when I think they contain too many irrelevant
quotes. In this instance, though, "Odie" had already chopped out most of
the earlier lines...and any further trimming, on my part, could've made
the message's true meaning impossible to grasp.

As Rod Speed said, elsewhere in the thread: "Some of us perfer to have
the context in the post."

I'm among those who "perfer," obviously. <g>


Cordially,
John Turco <[email protected]>

 

[Horst Franke]

In news:[email protected] John Turco typed:

I do edit my replies, when I think they contain too many irrelevant
quotes. In this instance, though, "Odie" had already chopped out most
of the earlier lines...and any further trimming, on my part, could've
made the message's true meaning impossible to grasp.

Hi John, NO - 7 levels are far too much and You would never try
to answer to all of them!

As Rod Speed said, elsewhere in the thread:
"Some of us perfer to have the context in the post."

But THAT had nothing to do with quoting levels but only
with news contents!

I'm among those who "perfer," obviously. <g>

Sorry quoting levels NE news contents on Your PC!
Horst

 

[Rod Speed]

Rod Speed wrote

Hi Rod, never mind!

You get no say what so ever on what I mind. Or anything else at all, either.

ALL news reader are able to see actual postings.

Wrong, as always. Some news servers dont get all the posts.

And there's no need to save personal copies while they are available via the news
server.

You dont know that they are with other
news servers than the one you are using.

Usenet rules

No such animal. Usenet is a close to pure anarchy as you will ever see.

specifies wow to use news server postings.

Wrong, as always.

This is again not understandable slang for me.

There is no slang whatever in that sentence.

Sorry but every news-reader I know is able to copy the news from the server on the local
disk.

Pity that not all posts end up on all news servers.

Oh no.

Fraid so.

Some rules are required for intercommunication!

There are no rules on QUOTING, stupid.

You would never be happy if I talk in German and You in English!

I dont bother with woggy languages, you lot lost the war. We won.

What is "lump"?

Put up with it.

 

[Rod Speed]

John Turco typed

Hi John, NO - 7 levels are far too much

You get no say what so ever on that or anything else at all, ever.

and You would never try to answer to all of them!

Doesnt need to, its the CONTEXT, stupid.

But THAT had nothing to do with quoting levels but only with news contents!

Wrong, as always. CONTEXT isnt the same thing as CONTENTS.

Try a dictionary.

Sorry quoting levels NE news contents on Your PC!

Repeat in pure english.

 

[chrisv]

Repeat in pure english.

I think it means "get stuffed", Ron. 8)

 

[John Turco]

Ouch. That must have hurt.
And what a letdown for your friend the babblehead.


Odd choice of words.


And you had to spoil my test.



After you're told.


Still you respond to his sockpuppets, even when he lays it on like a ton of
bricks that it is *him* but never to him directly when he is using his own
name.

<edit>

Hello, Stimpy/Folkert:

Recall, also, that even the "great" John Clarke, himself, was apparently
fooled by Rod Speed's "dew" alias, in the lengthy "Window is stealing
my HD" thread, recently! It was really quite entertaining, watching them
exchange "pleasantries."

Funnier, still, was how Rod played him like a percussion instrument. <g>


Cordially,
John Turco <[email protected]>

 

[John Turco]

In news:[email protected] John Turco typed:

Hi John, NO - 7 levels are far too much and You would never try
to answer to all of them!

But THAT had nothing to do with quoting levels but only
with news contents!

Sorry quoting levels NE news contents on Your PC!
Horst

Hello, Horst:

You definitely harbor some strange notions about Usenet, I see. Despite
belting out 40+ articles, since Wednesday (6-21-06) - which, according
to Google, is when your posting "career" began - it seems you've failed
to have any of them dispelled, yet.

This only goes to prove, once again, that quantity is hardly a fair
substitute for quality.


Cordially,
John Turco <[email protected]>

 

[Rod Speed]

<edit>

Hello, Stimpy/Folkert:

Recall, also, that even the "great" John Clarke, himself, was
apparently fooled by Rod Speed's "dew" alias, in the lengthy "Window
is stealing my HD" thread, recently! It was really quite
entertaining, watching them exchange "pleasantries."

Funnier, still, was how Rod played him like a percussion instrument. <g>

You'd be amazed at how many say similar things to me in email.