R
Robert Redelmeier
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips aether said:The crux of the hostility on the part of others in this thread,
is that I'm hateful and wrong for believing diversity is folly.
You are not hateful for your beliefs, however wrong they may be.
You might be hateful for rudeness or sloppy logic.
If you wish to argue against diversity, go ahead. It's
refreshing to see [mostly] old white men argue in favor
of it. You can hardly accuse anyone of self-serving bias!
But please define your terms well: Forced inclusion
of an underclass who are deprived of rights isn't
diversity. It's apartheid, Hutu/Tutsi, slavery, etc.
Diversity is more properly called Diversity & Inclusiveness.
It recognizes all as equals in dignity & rights even if not in
abilities and wealth. It works remarkably to the same extent it
is thoroughly implemented (US, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland).
I believe that, and I quote, "A diverse, peaceful, or stable
society is against most historical precedent." (Dick Lamm;
So is peace against historical precedent. That doesn't
make it undesireable.
Upon examining history, one finds that so-called 'diverse'
societies are in ceaseless conflict, rarely stable, and
always unhappy.
America? It has been about as diverse as Europe,
and a lot more peaceful.
Japan, I believe, should be the model of the West.
For Japan has a past, a present, and a future.
Interesting you should say that. Since the Meiji Restoration
(1856), they've been trying to learn from the West.
They don't like where they've been.
-- Robert