Z
zakezuke
I would like to ask something - do you think Canon and Epson and HP are
See for your self
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/10/25/in_living_color/page9.html
The HP DJ 8150 might be similar to the DeskJet 5940, they at least
share the same cartridges. With the 5940 you have the option to buy a
"99 photo cartridge" or use the regular #97, at least that's what a rag
said.
The epsons are still sold, the r220 has not changed.
But here is a brief lowdown
1. Epson -
- dye 6 tank printing
- pigment 4 tank or 6 tank printing
Their dye printers like the r200/r300 are not multi purpose
printers... expect text to cost more. Their cheap printers I find to be
fickle requiring manual head cleaning, and the head can not be removed.
Technicaly a longer lasting technology than what HP and Canon use.
The C series offers durabright pigment inks, quite good for text, quite
archival.
The R (800, 1800, 2400)series offers ultrachrome pigment inks, not as
archival from what i'm told, but beautiful. Not cheap.
All have aftermarket supplies.
2. HP
- 8150 and similar
Head on the cart type, optional photo cartridge and optional grey
cartridge. Slow to dry ink, but very archival on the right papers.
the Tri-color tank, while wasteful, isn't horrible in terms of cost per
print. Very good general purpose printer
Nice in the fact you can spend extra bucks to get extra spiffy photos
with smooth skintones, not so nice in the fact that their lower priced
models in this class only take two inktanks leaving one out to dry.
3. Canon
-ip3000/4000
Very good general purpose printer. Gets away with using only 4 colors
by using a very small drop size. Quite waterfast on canon's glossy
plus paper, and other microporous papers. Not so lightfast. Photos
tend to be a tad punchy for my taste... but still very good. Newer
Pixmas offer a smaller drop size, but no aftermarket supplies except
for bulk ink exist for those yet.
all equally good printers?
See for your self
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/10/25/in_living_color/page9.html
The HP DJ 8150 might be similar to the DeskJet 5940, they at least
share the same cartridges. With the 5940 you have the option to buy a
"99 photo cartridge" or use the regular #97, at least that's what a rag
said.
The epsons are still sold, the r220 has not changed.
But here is a brief lowdown
1. Epson -
- dye 6 tank printing
- pigment 4 tank or 6 tank printing
Their dye printers like the r200/r300 are not multi purpose
printers... expect text to cost more. Their cheap printers I find to be
fickle requiring manual head cleaning, and the head can not be removed.
Technicaly a longer lasting technology than what HP and Canon use.
The C series offers durabright pigment inks, quite good for text, quite
archival.
The R (800, 1800, 2400)series offers ultrachrome pigment inks, not as
archival from what i'm told, but beautiful. Not cheap.
All have aftermarket supplies.
2. HP
- 8150 and similar
Head on the cart type, optional photo cartridge and optional grey
cartridge. Slow to dry ink, but very archival on the right papers.
the Tri-color tank, while wasteful, isn't horrible in terms of cost per
print. Very good general purpose printer
Nice in the fact you can spend extra bucks to get extra spiffy photos
with smooth skintones, not so nice in the fact that their lower priced
models in this class only take two inktanks leaving one out to dry.
3. Canon
-ip3000/4000
Very good general purpose printer. Gets away with using only 4 colors
by using a very small drop size. Quite waterfast on canon's glossy
plus paper, and other microporous papers. Not so lightfast. Photos
tend to be a tad punchy for my taste... but still very good. Newer
Pixmas offer a smaller drop size, but no aftermarket supplies except
for bulk ink exist for those yet.