P
Paul
GMAN said:
There is an archived copy of 320553 here. It is another reference to Upperfilters
and Lowerfilters.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050120040429/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/320553
Paul
GMAN said:
Dale_Peterson said:I know you're trying to help me and I appreciate it. The CD came
installed in both of my laptops, and failed about 5 to 8 days later.
It's quite possible that the "prints laying on his desk" are of hisBurt said:A partial Measekite truth: fading. In accelerated fade tests done by
participants of the Nifty-Stuff forum it was demonstrated that after
prolonged exposure to UV light some of the non-OEM ink colors fade more than
Canon OEM inks. Unfortunately, Wilhelm didn't test the inks we use, nor did
Consumers or PC Magazine. Although accelerated fade tests do show increased
fading at some point, the pictures I have framed and on display, as well as
pictures in albums, have exhibited no apparent fading in approximately four
years. Measekite makes the same claim for prints that have been laying on
his desk. We have endured (read suffered) this claim for nearly four years.
I must assume that the very same prints have been gathering dust on his desk
for that period of time, which begs the question, why don't you ever clean
your damned desk? Don't you have more important things that should occupy
the surface of your desk? Like work? I'm afraid that the "no fading of
prints laying on the desk" claim has no more credibiliy than the rest of his
nonsense. Another product of a twisted imagination.
There is an archived copy of 320553 here. It is another reference to
Upperfilters
and Lowerfilters.
http://web.archive.org/web/20050120040429/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/32055
3
Paul
You are absolutely right, TJ. I would suggest, however, that if theTJ said:It's quite possible that the "prints laying on his desk" are of his
family. Despite what we may think, I doubt he emerged full-bodied from
some puddle of ooze somewhere. He had to have parents. Or perhaps it's
some unrequited love, someone who once rejected him because of his
obsessions. Whatever, there are legitimate reasons why a photo might
remain on a person's desk for several years.
TJ
You certainly have a point there.Burt said:You are absolutely right, TJ. I would suggest, however, that if the
pictures are of an unrequited love, someone who rejected him because of his
obsessions, we would also have had a report from him of the relative
waterproof qualities of OEM ink when subjected to his outpouring of tears
when viewing the photo continually for four years.
Dale_Peterson said:Barry Watzman said:When I said that no drivers are required, I meant no special, device
specific drivers. The normal drivers for your IDE port ... the same
port that may have your hard drive on it ... also handles optical IDE
drives [or SATA, if that is the type of interface in use]. And the
IDE port drivers are a standard, built-in part of Windows. Nothing
you need to download special, and nothing specific (unless you are
using some type of non-standard IDE port, such as an add-in PCI card).
I know you're trying to help me and I appreciate it. The CD came
installed in both of my laptops, and failed about 5 to 8 days later.
Thanks again
Dale P.............
Some of the Windows 9x drivers may yet be available, but it'll take aBarry said:Did anyone notice that on July 1st, HP removed ALL drivers for any OS'
before Windows 2000? You can no longer get drivers for any NT or 9x
systems, even ones which were posted online as of 6/30. You also cannot
any longer order CDs with these drivers. Either you have the driver
already (on CD or saved download), or you know someone else who has it,
or you are screwed. This was applicable to ALL HP products, across the
board, not just printers.