Microsoft! whether we can upload the projects (in .zip file) ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_AM_DON_AND_YOU?
  • Start date Start date
* "Fergus Cooney said:
Tell that to Herfried. <He's> the Troll

Please stop spamming the groups. Otherwise the only way to stop you
from annoying people here will be to contact your ISP in order to
disable your account.

The topic of this group is Programming in Visual Basic .NET, not
psychology or theory of languages.
 
* "Fergus Cooney said:
Attachments do not feature as part of the message when viewing a newsgroup via
the web.

If you would have a look at the implementation of multipart messages,
you would know that they are part of the message.

Read the RFCs. That's not topic of this group.

EOT
 
Hi Steve,

|| > I don't know if you've been following the battle
|| > bewteen Herfried and myself over quoting styles.
||
|| no...what do you suggest?

I recommend not bothernig with that particular wrangle. There are some
perhaps interesting points raise. A lot of waffle/garbage and some outright
childishness, especially now that we're all washed out. Current content
quality is very low although I've introduced a bit of psycholgy into the mix
in case it might prove useful to Herfried to learn a bit more about why there
is this difference between us. It's fundamentally a man-who-like-rules versus
a man-who-likes-his-own-rules thing.

That argument is all about my style of quoting which you can see above.
Its non-standard. That's all I'm going to say. But because it's been such as
issue, both of us are (temporarily) hyper sensitive to it. Hence I needed a
moan. Don't change you style unless it suits you. I'll get used to sentences
w/o full words. It s/b fairly easy - it was just b/c they are unfamiliar.
[Damned hard to type too!]

The dig I made a bit later about understanding - likewise discard. Just
more hot air. I'm a trained listener. Part of that training involves taking on
board (preferably enhancing) the correct attitudes. That, to me, makes it <my
responsibility> to understand <you> however you might express yourself. This
has become second nature to me but the cogs are slow at the moment.

I might have said that arguments are counter-productive, but I enjoy them
when conducted well. I especially like a decent conclusion (agree + agree to
disagree + respect).

|| i've read a lot of your posts and have participated
|| w/...errr...with you on some

LOL

Now that I'm here with you. (the whole day has gone and I haven't seen a
single genuine post yet) I played with sendWebRequest. I'm sure I got what you
did - no problem getting the authorisation page directly. No problem going to
that or the target page in the browser - but no joy with the target via s/wr
(ha!).

The trouble is that you know far more than me about these things, so I'm
just playing. That's why, in MeNo's thread, I have only stepped in
occasionally and left the carrying to you, lol. I know the concept is sound
but don't know the imlpementation. The tracks for the Iron Guru haven't been
laid in that direction yet.but the surveyor's been theolodificating. I hope
that doesn't leave you feeling lumbered.

Got to go. As far as it's my place to say it - Welcome aboard. ;-))

Regards,
Fergus

Thanks for the fruity compliment. :-) I can see you're another
spread-the-good-vibe kind of guy.
 
Hi Steve,

For me "road kill" is after-target - not a pretty sight.

|| i'm right there with you though...a magical 's' appeared for me
|| when i read it. either that's a common occurance or we are on
|| the same wave length. not sure which.

The 's' is from the first reason - perceptual expectation and fill-in.

I think the second reason applies to us anyway. Which is nice.

Regards,
Fergus
 
I detect that Mr W has got to the end of his tether when he asks a questions
and then stomps on the answer.

But do you have to do it in such a ridiculous way?

Why not simply stop posting?
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!
 
i'll try a different format...the ">" pushes the text over the 76 character
wrap limit on long lines so maybe that will help the sometimes weird
formatted quotes...i can't imagine that would fuel a flamed debate though.
anyway, i'll keep harrassing you. ;^) and, thanks for the mutual
compliments.

just remember...

|| Please tell me things like this by private mail and do not annoy the
|| other contributors with lots of OT posts. Thanks!

;^)
 
Back
Top