O
Osiris
seems, the sum of all posts is either *THE* solution or zero.
kony said:Err, I'd hardly call training for 2 years, even remotely
close to being a generation ahead of using a keyboard to get
the job done.
Seems quite the opposite, that SR is still far far behind
using a keyboard.
Rod Speed wrote:
<Snipped bullshit>
You truly are a *stupid* ****wit aren't you??
<plonk>
Rod said:Nope, the hands just move over the keyboard with the arms doing that instead.
No we dont. In spades when the arms are what moves.
Pity that doesnt happen.
Wrong again.
Wrong again.
Nope, they are clearly saying that last that zero is best. They are wrong.
I doubt you type enough to matter.
John said:Troll
WindsorFox said:Heh, I am beginning to wonder, although I *have* seen a couple of
correct and proper answers from said person.
WindsorFox said:Heh, I am beginning to wonder, although I *have* seen a couple of
correct and proper answers from said person.
Rod said:Bullshit. Have fun explaining the keyboards on typewriters
that were designed to be used by professional typists.
WindsorFox said:Rod Speed wrote
Do you have any references to back up your disagreements?
I can't find anything and I tend to trust Cornell Univ. on this since I can
correlate most of what you disagreed with to fact by personal experience.
It's a fact that typing with the hands bent in a upward position can exacerbate the
condition especially in people predisposed for it.
Zero degrees may not be the optimum, but until the release of the latest MS ergo key
board it was the best that could be achieved with a keyboard on a flat surface.
At $dayjob I have seen may people typing with their hands past a 15 degree angle
so it seems you may have limited experience with unexperienced typists
and this comes down to them not knowing better and/or not knowing how to adjust the
keyboard tray which allows for a keyboard to be tilted down towards the top end rather
than up.
It occurs that if some of your answers are to have any credibility you should provide
some insight into your reply beyond "nope" or "wrong."
Rod said:Osiris wrote
Doesnt specify a 'correct' keyboard angle.
Go and **** yourself. No please, that's an order.
kony said:Sure, you can type any way you please. The younger you are,
the less you type, and the more breaks or changes in
position you make, the less likely it'll be a problem.
On the other hand, people who ARE typing a _LOT_ and/or
having problems, will need to find out what to do about
it...
Rod said:Wrong with electric typewriters.
Wrong again. That was the keyboard layout letter
wise, designed to prevent jamming with typewriters
that had a basket of keys on long arms.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
Pity I am likely to be old enough to be your dad thanks, child.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
H. Seldon said:Osiris wrote:
Nah, I don't think so. Lack of knowledge I can obviously understand and
abide. *Arrogant* stupidity? That's another story.
You're correct. A few of his answers, in part, are not entirely withoutWindsorFox said:Heh, I am beginning to wonder, although I *have* seen a couple of
correct and proper answers from said person.
Which is more then you'll ever see from "John Doe",
whom I killfiled long ago and only see his messages when others
respond to them.
Path: newssvr29.news.prodigy.net!newsdbm05.news.prodigy.com!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-xfer.nntp.sonic.net!posts.news.sonic.net!nnrp0.nntp.sonic.net!not-for-mail
From: "Don Freeman" <freemand sonic.net>
Newsgroups: uk.comp.homebuilt,alt.comp.hardware,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
References: <Xns980C686231CB2835A1B 127.0.0.1> <4ios5sF4gu7gU1 individual.net> <Xns980C6CA16776E0123456789 207.115.17.102> <L5szg.105347$IZ2.46418 dukeread07>
Subject: Re: Correct angle for keyboard
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:43:37 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <44ce4f59$0$96181$742ec2ed news.sonic.net>
Organization: Sonic.Net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jul 2006 18:43:37 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9796137a.news.sonic.net
X-Trace: DXC=ZUNeQCBE=0 Mfan1jQn7DHm4K\QM1CV^ 1OYf0H`?;XA4;Gd<Oe3g_Kf5<9:`hbVo JBSiUnkkjgH mml43CJbEIH5I[4hlS>]F
X-Complaints-To: abuse sonic.net
Xref: prodigy.net alt.comp.hardware:316113 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:472689
WindsorFox said:Rod Speed wrote
Nope.
Only electric typewriters that do not have DaisyWheel, IBM Ball or digital technology.
A current typewriter has an almost flat keyboard
and if one is sitting at the proper height it should
not make much difference in *most* people.
You seem to know as much about this particular subject as you do about analog audio
equipment.
WindsorFox said:Rod Speed wrote
You mean those designed in 1968 before the affliction known as Carple tunnel syndrome
had a name?
Good comparison.
WindsorFox said:Rod Speed wrote
"General design includes items such as: palm rests; the visible
surfaces of the keytops; the SLOPE of the keyboard and keyboard SLOPE
ADJUSTMENT."
So if you have a book or .pdf that shows the full and actual wording of ISO 9241-4 would
you be so kind as to quote it....
Real mature.
Don said:Which is more then you'll ever see from "John Doe", whom I killfiled long
ago and only see his messages when others respond to them.
It's quite ironically humorous when he accuses someone else of trolling,
useless twit that he is.
You keep ignoring all those typewriters over more than a century now.
I did that, most obviously with the mention of typewriters thanks.