Best Registry Cleaner for vista

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
---------------------------------------------------------------------

It that you Doris? You're sounding more & more like the poster formally
know as "Doris Day".
He/she/it disappeared recently and now you appear sprouting the same
linux loser bs.
Well...?
Frank
Click to expand...


You sound just like Justin the faker that tried so hard to pass
himself off as something he wasn't...just like you constantly do
Frank.

How's that chain letter scam of yours doing? Anybody dumb enough to
send to cash yet?
 
I recognize that my experiment (still 100% positive) with a
specific registry cleaner does not constitute a statistically
valid experiment, but it was MY EXPERIMENT.

This unit continues to be more responsive in many respects, with
no change in stability. Everything seems to work fine, and I've
clicked through many installed apps looking for problems. So
far, so great.

Maybe I was just lucky, but it's really a pleasure... It also
suggests that Vista speed issues justify an examination of the
Registry - and I don't know enough to go beyond that.
 
Adam Albright wrote:

You sound just like Justin the faker that tried so hard to pass
himself off as something he wasn't...just like you constantly do
Frank.

How's that chain letter scam of yours doing? Anybody dumb enough to
send to cash yet?
Click to expand...

---------------------------------------------------------------

Do you always let the bottle do you're talking for you?
That's weak...you're weak lil'georgie boy.
Grow up...get help..aa...rehab...at least do something cause you're
pathetic.
Frank
 
"as if that implies some superior knowledge"
As always you are free to ASSUME what you want.
But ASSUMPTIONS often tend to be wrong.

"see the underlying pattern they know more, everybody else is dumb,"
And yet it is YOU that needs to directly insult and let your
ASSUMPTIONS control your actions.

"Microsoft should have killed the MVP program like they planned"
Do you communicate this to Microsoft as you have previously been told?
Or it it something you continuously whine?

"I simply don't like boastful windbags"
Interesting answer when I said:
"users need to know what a specific key does"
You seem to let your emotions take control when you do not like what
is said but you can not dispute the need for users to be
knowledgeable.

"you can't contain your anger"
So you say, and yet is is you unable to communicate without insulting.
Just because you imagine anger does not make it so.
If there is anger, it seems to be you since you are the one unable to
communicate without insults.
Keep ASSUMING, typical for you.

Don't bother answering unless you can do so in a civil manner.
I doubt you have the self control to be civil, but we shall see.
 
"as if that implies some superior knowledge"
As always you are free to ASSUME what you want.
But ASSUMPTIONS often tend to be wrong.
Click to expand...

Like yours that you can't get any benefit from Registry Cleaners?
 
Adam Albright said:
I think part of the hostility towards Registry Cleaners is once upon a
time they were garbage. Times change, things improve. Windows was once
garbage too. It's the same knock Real Player gets. It use to include
spyware and it got black listed, It hasn't for years, is still one of
the best players offering some of the best compression verses quality
you can get. Yet people hold a grudge or just are dumb and because of
it, take your pick, won't use it. ;-)
Click to expand...


As someone who does a little programming on the side, and one who writes using windows
APIs,
let me make a comment on registry cleaners.
Yes they will find "currently unused registry entries."
Occasionally they will actually correct a registry related problem that will prevent
installation of a program.

However, keep in mind that there are lot of static registry entries that are in place to
ensure
backwards compatibility with older programs, especially when it comes to using API calls
to ordinals ( routines in DLL files )
Example, if I reference, in my application, a dll procedure from a dll that was included
with Windows 98 and that
dll has been upgraded / replaced by a newer dll in newer windows versions, the entries in
the registry will automatically point my program to the newest version of the DLL on the
machine in which the application is installed.

So, if the "base" entry has been removed from the registry, guess what, my backwards
compatible app fails to run.

So as was stated earlier in the thread, use "ANY" registry cleaner at your own risk, and
when the app you try to install
That's "supposed" to be compatible with your new windows version fails to run, don't blame
the author, restore your registry.

And yep I'm an MVP for a different technology and YEP I will include it in my sig.


--

Steve Easton
Microsoft MVP FrontPage
FP Cleaner
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/fpclean.htm
Hit Me FP
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/HitMeFP.htm
 
"can't get any benefit from Registry Cleaners"
I never said that .
Go back and read my posts again probably for the first time.
Typical how you need to twist what was said to fit your agenda.
 
I agree with most that it is not necessary and requires caution. That said
Alias recommendation works fine and ALWAYS let it backup any entries you are
going to delete. Unless you do a huge amount of installing and uninstalling
of programs I would forget about it.
 
"can't get any benefit from Registry Cleaners"
I never said that .
Go back and read my posts again probably for the first time.
Typical how you need to twist what was said to fit your agenda.
Click to expand...


Damn, Jupiter you're so good at back pedaling! That's your true
talent.
 
Not at all.
It is you that is so bad at misquoting others to suit your agenda.
It is not "back pedaling" to tell you I did not say what you claimed I
said when I never said it.
It is your imagination.
Of course if you can show where I said it.
But then if you could you already would have, but you CAN'T.
Instead you have shown yourself as one who need to misquote others.
Your continued attacks. void of facts.

Good bye Adam.
You continue to show you have NOTHING of value.
Reply back only if you feel the need to feed your ego.
No other purpose will be served.
 
Adam said:
You're entitled to your opinion even if it isn't factual. The whole
point behind Registry Cleaners is to avoid deleting something by
mistake. Of course any tool used improperly isn't very smart. What you
avoid saying is Registry Tools while most have some automatic feature
also show you a list of what it is about to remove BEFORE it actually
does, allowing the user to decide what to delete and what not to. Of
course if anybody just haphazardly removes things without knowing why
that is dumb. However suggesting people manually scan tens of
thousands of lines in the Registry looking for "bad" things on their
own is in my opinion equally risky and very time consuming. Stop being
anal.
Click to expand...

plonk
 
Daave said:
Why not?
Click to expand...

For those with a problem like mine on a system similar to mine,
it would be wise. But I may have hit on a great combination of
utility plus system configuration - it worked for me but might
be a problem for you. And, I will promote/support products or
procedures only after seeing a reasonable number of successes.
 
Microsoft has a FREE beta registry cleaner. It is part of One care! You can
download it on their main page.
 
I'm anything but a "fanboy," but I would like to see you present these
facts.
Click to expand...

The fact is Registry Cleaners work when used properly is well
documented. All that's required is learning how to use Google and
you'll find countless articles from some REAL experts, not the fakers
that hang out here that confirm it.
 
Back
Top