Hi MeshVictim
Thanks for all ur help, i emailed Ms Anderson to let her know of my situation so she can add it to her files, but she isnt allowed to help me bcoz i am in Glasgow, i found that out wen i foned brent trading standards last time. Consumer direct were a waste of time, and thats who u get wen u fone the trading standards number, they wont refer me to a trading standards officer unless i give Muppet PCs 14 days to respond to my letter. I went to c a solicitor who sent Muppet PC's a letter demanding they refund me the full amount under my statutory rights, for the PC not being fit for purpose. I have had only 1 phone call after that from Muppet computers, askin me permission to format my HDD for calibration purposes. They have yet to acknowledge any of the letters. Wen i spoke to them over the fone last monday i was told quite categorically that i would not b getting any refund as i had the system for over a year. The Kadra muppet then went on to quote the dates. she said they sent the PC on the 28/01/05 which was a friday, so wouldn't have received it till the monday, which would have been the 31/01/05. and i first reported the fault on the 26/01/06 so that was more than a year(!?), and there would be no refund.
I also went in to c trading standards in Glasgow rather than trying to fone them, and the woman was quite helpful. i told her the story and she took their address and fone number and said she would contact them and let me know how she got on.
I juz want to add that the post that got removed by muckshifter was not a 1 sided rant or dig at muppet computers. It was in fact an email reply i recieved stating the position of 1 of the mags forum editors on why they recommend muppets pc's. i merely copy and pasted it. I made no judgement on it i left it for all to c, but it was removed for being "defamatory". Maybe Muckshifter and i have got our wires crossed, bcoz i dont c how i could have went on a one sided attack against a person or organization when i didnt write the email in the first place.
I would also like to say that i agree with the fact that it was removed, juz not the reason for removing it, and the post regarding myself after that, didnt represent an accurate discription of wot i posted.
I felt it was relevent considering we all purchase these mags, who give us recommendations, and i thot it would b nice to hear wot they had to say about this. Unfortunatley it seems it's not as simple as that.
Thank you to the people who run this website and forum for letting us all have our say and keeping it fair. cheers