J. Clarke said:
No, mindless as in misrepresenting both products, setting up special cases
that make one look "better" artificially, that sort of thing.
Nope. If the VGA Silencer looks to be the best solution for a particular
situation then I have no problem with using it. But it is not "better" or
"worse" than the Zalman, it's just "different".
I don't think *you* are being at all objective here.
Because I am saying the VGA Silencer is "better", your conclusion is that I
am biased. Has it occured to you that I might actually be correct and that
the VGA Silencer might actually be better? Objectively better?
Your statement that they are merely "different" implies that the VGA
Silencer has some advantages and the Zalman has others. So let me ask you,
given that the VGA Silencer *is* objectively better than the Zalman in a
number of ways, e.g. its a better overclocker, its easier to fit and its
cheaper to buy, please can you tell me in what ways (objectively) the Zalman
is better?
I can think of none. Nil, zero, nada.
And if there are none, then its a perfectly reasonable conclusion that the
VGA Silencer is better, isn't it. How can they be equal if the VGA Silencer
is better in some ways and the Zalman is better in zero ways. How can that
score them equal? Which is why I am saying its better!
When someone starts
insisting that a given solution is "better" and something else is worthless
in absolute terms rather than relative to a particular set of circumstances
then anything he says must be taken with a large dose of salt.
Unless its true, of course!!! And anyway, I never said the Zalman was
worthless. In fact I said its probably quite good too. I merely state that
there was no point in buying it since it is objectively inferior to an
alternative product that costs 1/2 the price or less.
By the way, I note another post in which someone busted his core with a VGA
Silencer trying to circumvent the little situation that it has with respect
to the shim on ATI boards--seems that despite allegedly being designed
specifically for ATI it doesn't have the raised contact area that is needed
to get good core contact without removing the shim.
I can only conclude he went mad overclocking or didn't fit it properly. It
can have nothing to do with the VGA Silencer design, see below.
The Zalman comes with
two contact plates, one of them having that raised area and clearly
designed to address that specific issue.
Seems like a nice idea, but in practice, its clearly a waste of time.
Otherwise, I (and others) wouldn't be able to run a 9700 Pro at 410MHz all
day (with the shim on) with a VGA Silencer, would we/they. If the heat
wasn't getting through to the VGA Silencer, this could never work. But it
does work, so clearly the lack of a raised area on the VGA Silencer is of no
consequence.
You can struggle all you like with this. But I maintain that the fact is
the VGA Silencer is plain and simple a better product, but because *you*
bought the Zalman, you just can't handle the fact.
Chip.