In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Keith said:
That depends on how you define "strength".
Yes, it does. I consider "strength" to be from inherent
attractiveness or logic. Something integral to the the thing
itself, not added on afterwards.
I consider the power of law, (i.e. "hate crimes") "strength".
OK. I consider the need to resort to law/rules to be an obvious
sign of weakness. BTW: I have no problems with "hate crimes" as
defined in the US (but big problems with the EU defn). In the US,
the hate element only increases punishments for existing crimes, it
doesn't create new ones. That's fair, because criminal punishments
should be to maintain some vision of social order.
I consider the threat of loss of a job for a wrongly worded
phrase, "strength".
That (and all the other event you list) can happen. They do happen,
but hardly on any statistically significant base. It is not
strength to worry excessively about low-probability consequences.
Ironically, it is PCesqe to whine about the injustices of PC!
In this specific instance, I fully expect to face consequences
for all my actions. Losing a job isn't the end of the world
(at least not in most parts of the US (but perhas worse in EU).
I didn't own the job.
I consider grading on colleges by thought, "strength".
This has happened from time immemorial. Any teacher who grades by
agreement rather than quality of work is incompetant. One should
always avoid incompetants, especially as teachers. But when you
make a mistake, take your medecin and don't whine about it.
Political Correctness has a *lot* of "strength". Yes,
it is prior restraint, but more insideous because it is
not officially santioned by government, thus doesn't fall
under the first amendment.
So? You cannot (and arguable should not) legislate rationality.
of providing a limited external news service, but one must justify
the need. ...kinda like the paranoia of the Usenet two decades
ago. For $12/year I'll not fill out the stupid forms, thanks.
Perhaps. But isn't this another way of giving into the trolls?
You may be right, but the infusion of AOLers and Googlies
hasn't been exactly a great thing either.
I think it has. Sure, there's lots of dross, but a few gems
arrive too. New blood is always needed.
-- Robert