S
Supreme Enchanter
Win 2000? Likes like a mac OS 7. Win XP ihas been out for a while and
longhorn is floating around now.
longhorn is floating around now.
Bill Van Dyk said:Thank you, Mr. Lemming.
Bill Van Dyk said:Right--
My biggest gripe is unfulfilled promises. USB was supposed to allow you to plug
in or unplug devices "on the fly".
But Windows has a hissy fit if you turn off your digital camera, for example,
even if you don't need it and aren't accessing it anymore. And USB doesn't
reach sustained speeds at the claimed performance levels. And it can and will
bring your entire system down with a crash. It is, in a word, pathetic.
Firewire is elegant and reliable. Plug in the camcorder, run Premiere, load the
data. When you're done, disconnect or shut off the camera.... and not a peep
from firewire.
It is actually quite remarkable that USB can't do that. It is beyond
incompetent.
Supreme Enchanter said:I have 6 USB ports and 2 firewire on XP. No problems. However, as I said
earlier, win XP screws up if you have more than 2 firewire ports on a PCI
card.
Bill Van Dyk said:Right--
My biggest gripe is unfulfilled promises. USB was supposed to allow you to plug
in or unplug devices "on the fly".
That might be because of limits to the PCI interface as regards transferSupreme said:I have 6 USB ports and 2 firewire on XP. No problems. However, as I said
earlier, win XP screws up if you have more than 2 firewire ports on a PCI
card.
It's a cost-cutting thing, no doubt. I don't think it would be "more"
expensive to implement on a PC, but in a cut-throat competitive world of
hundreds of PC makers, any way to shave a few pennies is going to make a
significant difference in sales. So they keep costs down by not giving you
Firewire.
Apple, on the other hand, is free to put whatever hardware they want onto
their machines, knowing that people will buy (not like they really have a
choice) -- and in so doing also give themselves a reputation for being an
innovator and market leader ("first to have Firewire as a standard feature!")
the JarHead said:Apple developed and built the Firewire technology. Which is why Mac's
had Firewire before they had USB...
nospam said:thats false. the original imac in mid 1998 was the first mac with usb,
and it did not have firewire at all. roughly six months later they
shipped a g3 tower with firewire.
Apple developed and built the Firewire technology. Which is why Mac's
had Firewire before they had USB...
But at any rate, I haven't seen a motherboard without firewire
capability in at least one to two years. I'm not claiming they aren't
there, but it's easier to find one with, than without.
Bill Van Dyk said:My point is that when we as consumers flock to a particular standard simply
because it appears to be winning the market place, we end up with crap like VHS
and USB and Celine Dionne instead of Beta and Firewire and Lucinda Williams.
There are often good reasons for making decisions based on pure technical
considerations and fighting for competition in the marketplace, which ultimately
benefits all consumers. In fact, when curmudgeonly people like myself resist
the herd mentality and buy products that haven't won wide acceptance but are
technically superior, we do a service for all consumers, by sustaining
competition and demanding better performance from manufacturers.
In other words, people should think for themselves. The reason we have to put
up with so much bad software, stupid laws, and annoying celebrities, is because
sometimes we behave like sheep.
Mark M said:So which of my devices should I have refused to purchase since they
weren't available with firewire?
My 10D?
Any of my other 25 currently used USB devices?
Which ones should I have passed by in the name of firewire?