M
Mark M
Richard Ragon said:Of which were cross posted, and I can't see..
So it was YOU who missed what was "obvious" to all but you.
Richard Ragon said:Of which were cross posted, and I can't see..
Mark said:So it was YOU who missed what was "obvious" to all but you.
Editor www.nutritionsoftware.org said:My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.
Could someone explain why this is so?
I am sure there are good reasons behind all this.
Richard Ragon said:So... if I don't subscribe to every one of the news forums that this was
posted too.. I'm missing the obvious?
My latest Dell has 6 USB 2.0 ports. But no 1394!
I'd prefer to have 4 USBs and 2 FWs instead.
Mark said:There are comparatively few devices that utilize firewire over USB, and
since USB 2.0 is fully compatible with the zillions of existing USB 1.0
devices, it makes sense for all computers to come equipped with 2.0.
Bill Van Dyk said:My biggest gripe is unfulfilled promises. USB was supposed to allow you to
plug in or unplug devices "on the fly".
Bill Van Dyk said:But Windows has a hissy fit if you turn off your digital camera, for example,
even if you don't need it and aren't accessing it anymore.
Enough said:Gee, works fine here. Oh, wait! I use a Mac!
Enough said:Gee, works fine here. Oh, wait! I use a Mac!
Charlie said:That's how USB and firewire both work on my Mac.
Bill Van Dyk said:Right--
My biggest gripe is unfulfilled promises. USB was supposed to allow you to plug
in or unplug devices "on the fly".
David said:I plug and unplug many of my USB-2 devices at will with XP. no
problems, except hard drives. Drives can be set up to not require
being stopped in software before disconnecting
In rec.video.desktop Charlie Dilks said:That's how USB and firewire both work on my Mac.