A
Alias
Roy said:No, it's "general" as "topics not dealt with in other groups in m.p.w.v.*".
rOy
Which would include comments regarding the OS, be they positive or negative.
Alias
Roy said:No, it's "general" as "topics not dealt with in other groups in m.p.w.v.*".
rOy
Roy said:Alias schrieb:
...
...
Working towards an OBE?
rOy
Roy said:I prefer openSUSE 10.2 - especially now after the Microsoft/Sun
agreement;-)
rOy
Richard Urban said:Do you have a question regarding the operation of Vista on your operating
system??
OR - are you just lonely and wasting time?
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
Richard Urban said:Nice to hear your thoughts.
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
(For email, remove the obvious from my address)
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
Charlie Wilkes said:It appears that a lot of people are having problems with Vista:
-- Doesn't support legacy software
-- 3d party drivers unavailable or unstable
-- Numerous weird glitches, e.g. -- Vista changed properties for .exe
file extension so user can't run programs, user has to re-validate
license every few days, system blue screens on bad driver and has to
be cleaned up in safe mode, system freezes right after booting up.
Anyone can get a nice-looking, slick, powerful Linux OS for free. But
most people prefer to buy Windows, because it offers superior hardware
compatibility, supports the most popular software titles, and is more
polished/less buggy.
If the consumer marketplace discovers that Vista falls short on the
core benefits that justify paying $$$ for closed source vs. free open
source... will they continue to pay anyway?
Charlie
I don't disagree with you but Linux does have a chance to get a foot in the
door with Vista. Vista is sufficiently different from previous Windows that
there will be some backlash from consumers. If an enterprising OEM was to
offer a user friendly version of Linux they may make some headway. I'm not
saying it will or should happen just that it's possible.
First off I think you raise some valid questions but here is my take:
1. Legacy software - I've found that a lot of legacy software does play
nicely with Vista and those applications that don't will in time be upgraded
to work with Vista. Moving to Mac or Linux would only make this problem
worse so Vista would seem to be the best choice if this were the sole
consideration in a move from XP.
2. 3rd party drivers will arrive faster than they did for the move to
Windows 2000. It is a problem with any new OS that gets resolved with a bit
of time. If we look at alternatives try legally running OS X on your
IBM\Lenovo, HP, Dell, Acer, etc.....not! While Linux hardware support has
steadily improved it is not on the level of Windows XP.
3. Weird glitches come with a new operating system as large and complex as
Vista. Service packs and fixes will arrive over time and solve many of
these glitches.
So all three of the problems you mentioned are temporary and if you are not
prepared to be on the bleeding edge you may be better served by sticking
with XP for the short term. My guess is in a year or so the concerns you
have raised will disappear.
In terms of Linux, give it a try in either a dual boot or boot from CD mode.
I think you may find that the concerns you raised in the three points above
exist there too. There are pro's and con's to Windows\OS X and Linux. In
the long run my guess is that Vista will become the dominant OS once again
but for now you can avoid all of the concerns you raised just by sticking
with XP.
Charlie Wilkes said:Thanks for a thoughtful response. Presumably Vista will succeed if
it's not too troublesome in the near term, and if drivers and patches
roll in quickly enough.
But the broader, long-term question is really whether people will
continue to see value in the upgrade cycle if what they are doing is
the same old word processing, email and web surfing,
organizing/printing digital photos, and ripping/burning music.
MS (or somebody) needs to come up with a whole new category of
compelling applications that require the latest, fastest machines with
a 64 bit OS. What might that be? One possibility is a 3d monitor
that maps holograms in an aquarium-sized lucite block, instead of
bitmaps on a flat plane. Imagine what that would do for gaming.
There must be other possibilities as well.
Without something juicy to whet the appetite, consumers might decide
to stick with the computer they've had for the past few years.
Kerry said:I much prefer Fedora or Suse over Unbuntu but that's just me. For the
average computer user Ubuntu is a much friendlier choice. I think Ubuntu
or something like it would be an acceptable alternative to Windows or OS
X for a lot of people. We'll never know because I don't see anyone
making a real effort to sell a Linux box. It would take very deep
pockets to get any market penetration.
Dale said:I can see how well it's working for Apple and Linux.
Dale