J
jo
Bob said:Oh, and never tell anyone you're plonking them. That's the best
way.
*PLONK*
Bob said:Oh, and never tell anyone you're plonking them. That's the best
way.
subject as help for filtering. Instead, one has to filter the poster,
and still get all the replies.
*ProteanThread* said:flooding
is not only good for readers of acf but its also good for freeware
developers to get their work at least recognized so that somone may find use
for it. certainly in these floods i'm not the only one who has found more
than one useful program posted that I now use, correct?
R. L. said:TedK <[email protected]> says in
So, what particular programs do you want to discuss? Let's
start it right now right here I myself have had fun
taking about Firefox ... You know, everyone can start a thread
that they like...seriously, what types of programs are you
interested in? Let's go for a venture to find them, review
them, and dicuss them (and perhaps even make them sound
like a good idea?
You can always start a dissussion that *you* are interested
in, I sure will try to join the discussion if it is something
that I am also interested in.
jo said:I think flooding is a bad thing. Good stuff gets hidden in the pile,
and non flooders don't bother to post so as not to add to the noise. I
will pay careful attention to ten carefully chosen posts; I pay very
little attention to a hundred.
Just because it is on topic shouldn't mean one does it casually.
Floods of Beatles in an mp3 group is a bad thing; floods of freeware
in a freeware group is a bad thing.
I also filter out the annoying posts to preserve my sanity and
to save time. However, some of the flooders are good folks, and do
not deserve being permanently killfiled.
Oh, and never tell anyone you're plonking them. That's the best
way.
H-Man said:Again, starting discussions, IMO belongs in the discussions group.
Can you avoid the replies too? If so, how?
However, what we can start doing (and I'm going to post
this else where so that other flooders see this) is to put
"mini" descriptions in the subject like, such as if its
another archive program, a notepad replacement, a game, a
directory utility, a screen saver, a kids program, etc.
Would that help ?
folks differ...I, personally, feel floods as overwhelming andand there are programs that never get mentioned or recognized at all until
they are noted here, in acf. some of these are quite good, frankly, and
probably better than whats on that so called pricelessware list. flooding
is not only good for readers of acf but its also good for freeware
developers to get their work at least recognized so that somone may find use
for it. certainly in these floods i'm not the only one who has found more
than one useful program posted that I now use, correct?
Bill Day said:folks differ...I, personally, feel floods as overwhelming and
distracting. (ESPECIALLY when it is just a name with no description).
30-40 programs a day blur, rather than entice. And in 2 weeks they will
have dropped out of sight up the list as MORE floods come in. I have
been a regular reader and 'sometimes' poster here for ummmmm..5-6 years?
(Since BEFORE John Corliss started getting flamed by Mabbet & crew!!)
I am not a computer pro in real life, I just try to sort thru these
things to make life easier....put me down as one vote to kinda ease off
on the quantity in favor of fewer posts with reviews & such....if I
want to be inundated with choices, or need something special, I can go
to SOS or Henk's sites ..(or just ask here, as I have done a couple
times)
.....just the opinion of one curmudgeonly old woodworker with a
fascination with what computers can do.....
*ProteanThread* said:news:[email protected]... [...]
for it. certainly in these floods i'm not the only one who has found more
than one useful program posted that I now use, correct?
In the past several weeks I find few postings from the people I found a
source of information. Instead, today I find over 1,000 posts, too many
of which come from Protean, R.L., Tramp and Vegard Krog, that relate to
individual programs that, for the most part, are of no interest to me.
Trying to review all of them is a time-consuming and frustrating
effort. A use of my time that I cannot expend.
dszady said:*ProteanThread* said:news:[email protected]... [...]
for it. certainly in these floods i'm not the only one who has found more
than one useful program posted that I now use, correct?
I wouldn't know because with you it's hard to get a word in edge-wise.
Tramp said:|A flood of freeware (on-topic) will always be appreciated more than a
|flood of flames.
|
|And the names of the programs and way they are posted are easily
|discerned. I myself have by-passed most without any problem.
Thank you. I am always amazed at the attitude of "You're posting way to
much freeware."
--
Tramp said:Thank you. I am always amazed at the attitude of "You're posting way to
much freeware."
Tramp said:This is the only newsgroup I subscribe to where posting on topic
information is complained about.
*ProteanThread* said:snip
and there are programs that never get mentioned or recognized at all until
they are noted here, in acf. some of these are quite good, frankly, and
probably better than whats on that so called pricelessware list.
is not only good for readers of acf but its also good for freeware
developers to get their work at least recognized so that somone may find use
for it. certainly in these floods i'm not the only one who has found more
than one useful program posted that I now use, correct?