C
CJT
OTOH, I've run a flock of them 24 by 7 with no failures.Beemer said:I just junked a 160gb YAR41BW0 diamondmax, just a month out of warranty,
other than that, title says it all.
OTOH, I've run a flock of them 24 by 7 with no failures.Beemer said:I just junked a 160gb YAR41BW0 diamondmax, just a month out of warranty,
other than that, title says it all.
CJT said:OTOH, I've run a flock of them 24 by 7 with no failures.
Pathetic, really.
Pathetic, really.
The SMART temp.
You know what it is. Its the temperature reported in the SMART data.
The temperature of the mechanical portion
of the HD is completely irrelevant.
Who cares ? Its clearly what the manufacturer
has decided is the temperature that matters.
There arent that many 7200 RPM drives that dont.
You just leave that one out of the collection, ****wit.
larry moe 'n curly said:Rod Speed wrote
It seems that you didn't measure anything,
otherwise you'd post the numbers.
And the soup de joure is the soup of
the day, but that's not what I asked.
Why?
Isn't it most of the heat,
and doesn't it cause the electronics to run hotter?
Nope.
Of that it's cheaper to implement the sensor
that way and it's readings are close enough.
Why, when I can measure temps without SMART?
Rod said:larry moe 'n curly <[email protected]> wrote
Pathetic, really.
Best get that seems machinery seen to then, child.
Or I didnt bother to record them, child.
You know what it is. Its the temperature reported in the SMART data.
Your problem.
The temperature of the mechanical portion
of the HD is completely irrelevant.
Because different designs get rid of the heat differently, child.
Depends entirely on how the drive is used, child.
Nope.
Who cares ? Its clearly what the manufacturer
has decided is the temperature that matters.
Still better than your completely ****ed approach.
<reams of your puerile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed
where it belongs>
larry moe 'n curly said:Rod Speed wrote
Use a pencil the next time so your scotch doesn't smear the ink.
You'll never quit drinking excessively if you keep that attitude.
So you're saying that a big chunk of aluminum less than
1/8" from the chips doesn't make those chips hotter?
That's not credible.
Rod said:larry moe 'n curly <[email protected]> wrote
The temperature of the mechanical portion
of the HD is completely irrelevant.
Nope, not saying anything like that.
larry moe 'n curly said:Rod Speed wrote
You said it doesn't make the electronics
run hotter but that you're not saying that.
Rod said:larry moe 'n curly <[email protected]> wrote
The temperature of the mechanical portion
of the HD is completely irrelevant.
Nope, not saying anything like that.
Never ever could bullshit its way out of a wet paper bag.
Rod said:Some gutless ****wit desperately cowering behind
larry moe 'n curly <[email protected]>
desperately attempted to bullshit its way out of its
predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
larry moe 'n curly said:All I did was say that all but one HD I checked ran at
about the same temperature at their aluminum castings.
You said 1) that wasn't true; 2) the casting temp. was irrelevant;
3) the electronics temp. was the important temp.; 4) the casting
temp had no effect on the electronics temp.; 5) I did not wait 2
hours to measure temps.