I meant that you may well find it hard to find a dot matrix
printer that is USB but its trivial to find a laser that does.
I would never buy another dot-matrix, and if this one died I'd forget the
FedEx forms and do them by hand. I don't do that many anymore anyway. Yes,
almost all lasers are USB2 now, so if I dumped these old Brother printers it
would be little trouble finding a USB laser with Epson FX emulation, but
unfortunately all such printers with this emulation are above the
entry-level price. I don't need a major laser printer here, which is why
I've held onto these oldies. Anyway, if parallel becomes an endangered
species I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.
Yeah, but I've had heaps say that about the Logitech and MS
keyboards too. I use the keyboard a lot more than most do.
I too am big on keyboard use. I have my business program coded with the
mouse set OFF and doesn't even show the cursor. It is Foxpro DOS, BTW.
(Don't even suggest that I "upgrade" to a Windows version. Thank you very
much.) I use only keyboard commands, like f-keys, ctrl's and alt's, etc.
Since data entry is predominant, I don't have to remove my hands from the
keyboard. I have not learned most PhotoShop keyboard commands, however, and
rely on the pen tablet or trackball almost exclusively for that.
I wouldn't pay that much, as you can pick up used Northgates for <$100,
usually. I've seen them go for $150 or more, though, but ~$75 is the norm
these days for an Ultra-T.
I used to prefer clicking keyboards but found that I got
used to the non clicking keyboards and the Logitech and
MS keyboards arent mushy at all. The only problem with
them is that they arent double injection moulded keytops
and so the lettering does wear off.
All the new M$ and Logitech I've used still feel mushy to me by comparison.
I'm not saying they're all bad, just not as "clicky." One drawback of the
clicky keyboards is that people can hear the sounds while talking to them on
the phone, and that might be construed by some as being rude. I can usually
multitask, though, and do it anyway--maybe with a lighter touch. It's hard
to mask the clicks on this keyboard, though.
I dont even bother with PS/2 keyboards anymore, let alone AT format.
Mine are PS2, but need an adapter for that. No problem, really, and USB
adapters are available.
I dont care much about the feel, in fact in many ways I prefer
the lighter modern key feel. In spades with the weight of the
total keyboard. The old DEC LK101 keyboard was much too
heavy for my style of use. Main advantage is that it did have
proper double injected keytops so the letters never wear off.
I prefer feel over the other stuff, but I'm in a minority. Most people I
know want the programable keys, etc.
Yep, like I said, I'm quite a bit older than you.
Geez, a real geezer! Sometimes I feel like one.
Yeah, I used to run a massive great DEC RS09. Thats got
a head per track, literally, with electronic switching instead
of physically moving the heads. To format it you needed to
borrow the formatter from DEC, a suitcase full of logic cards.
Never had one of those at home tho.
That's before my computing life began. I have seen these, though, and I'm
truly amazed.
Makes no sense to use other than sata now, that way you
can have a mobile rack that doesnt flout the standards.
I have no SATA racks yet, but the next ones I buy will be. As the IDE's
fade I'll need them, but none of these drives want to die. I have two old
20gb IBM (pre-Deathstar) dating back to 2000 that are still trucking along,
although I pulled them off of clone duty when my C: drive exceeded 20gb.
Don't know what to do with them now, but I won't throw them out.
Maybe they could see service for a print server some day.