If that's the best analogy you can come up with, uh, it's a loser. I have
a perfectly good screwdriver that's over forty years old. I certainly
don't have a computer anywhere near that age; perhaps 1/8 that.
mm so, i have read your usual critism of WORLD and will as I please
air some of my own.
So 40 year old, no money to buy a nice new one?
Since I've gone electric I rarely use manual screwdrivers for much mroe
than opening paint cans.
But you do not do electronics obviously, or ever tried to fix a watch..
You know these nice instrument screwdrivers....
My 12YO 12V Makita driver-drill is about at the
end of its batteries (it's been more or less replaced by a 14.4V Porter
Cable), but it still works. Batteries are too expensive so I bought a new
driver.
Bus driver?????
If there is a similarity to computers, this is it.
Nope, wrong again....
Screwdrivers are long and thin, computers are big boxes.
As Tony
has pointerd out, parts are too expensive.
Depends, floppy drive is 10$, DVD drive 50$ or so here....., monitor 250$,
keyboard 10$, mouse free with a box of chocolates.... ;-)
Yep, I have three and will likely buy at least two more this year.
You want ??YOU?? want to look superior, not me, problem with you Keith
is that you are a little screamer with too much money and opinion and too
little knowledge where it counts.
We all already figured that out from your previous replies.
Have you ever written an OS Keith, no you have not.
How many applications do you have out there for Linux as GPL Keith?
Howe many of those did you have to do user support for for let's just say
BSD Linux Suse, redhat, Debian Mandrake and quite a few other Keith?
I'd say come and talk again when you have.
As to you using 'a' PC that needs 64 bit ?? to do some job faster, sure,
there are (for example technical) cases (for example running a FPGA
syntesize) where that would be nice.
Specially when you are really bad at it and need to do it 30 times to
get it right.
But that is NOT the normal 'office' job.
So the point of your diatribe against GUIs is that some people shouldn't
be allowed to use computers? That is, if one uses a GUI one shouldn't be
*allowed* to own a computers?
Last time I delivered a 'turn key' system (running Linux) I spend 2 days
instructing the users... Had one phone call and one telnet session to
remotely fix a problem....
Yes there is a GUI, but all they use it for is scripted, with menus,
applications written with xforms, small fast and GPL.
No overhead.
And to explain how to use fvwm with 8 xterms took an hour.
And solved ........ help desk calls....
You need to learn people to do the right thing.
You should NOT addict people to the wrong thing, then they are always
depending on YOU.
And this is what I mend by 'customer binding, 'market protection'.
LEARN people the basics of Unix, and they can fly.
Learn them how to click on a GUI and they STILL have no clue after 15 years
what they are actually doing or what a computer or processor is.
To teach them Unix is not a really big job, it is in essence simple.
But those who build sand castles on it, and teach people sand castles -those
should know- when the sea comes in, all will be of the past.
I personally believe in the sanity of people as far as they have not been
misinformed by others...the GUI has become a religion... for them.
I hope you can see that when you have 6000 commands that it makes no sense
to have an icon on the desktop for each one, or have a pulldown memory
structure to access these n a normal size normal resolution screen.
GUI is nice for some stuff, but think, our language has thousands of words.
Most of the time you know what you want 'pizza, cola, car, house, yes
even electric screwdriver, sex, money, etc etc,' so let's make a menu.
Now we want a submenu for pizza pepperoni, fungi, salami etc...
I hope you with your superior intellect can see that it is so much simpler
to USE THE LANGUAGE WE ALREADY HAVE (caps are free on my PC BTW) and say:
pizza mozzarella.
And here it pops up.
Of course that expect you to have leaned reading and writing, know pizza
types... and thus probably excludes large parts of the world, but those
would not be using the PC anyways but chasing rabbits in the wild... so
for the rest it is faster then a GUI -either via icons or menus-.
So why did you do it if it hurt so much. Are you a masochist? Or are you
trying to look somehow superior?
I wanted to run xmenuconfig to compile the new kernel, it told me it could
not find Qt, so I downloaded the latest, compiled it and found xmenuconfig
now is broken as it only supports the older Qt 3.something.
This is the way we learn.
I also ran the Qt demos to see what sort of new thing all this bloat added,
and nothing NOTHING referring to the above new.. and imagemagick does all
that too I think.
So you are trying to look superior. Figures.
I can point out that I was doing special effects on a K6 in video when
it simply was not available anywhere else in Linux, so yes some code was
written by me. Where is yours? I am just stating facts.
Save money? By using ancient hardware? I don't think so!
Since when is GUI or xterm hardware related? get a clue.
If it hurts, stop doing it.
A bit of hyperbole, no?
Nope, exactly the way it is.
Soft and hardware industry support each other .. aided by a large legion of
'have no clue' sales people who will sell you that octal core hyperon for
email.
The $100 laptop will get here when there is a government somewhere willing
to subsidize the other $400.
It will not be made in the US but looks like Taiwan now.
They will make profit at 100$
As agreed earlier Keith is a special case.
We will never agree on anything likely, probably even on the fact that we
will never agree.
How can one disagree with that?
Keith will tell us ;-)