Novell Desktop Linux 10: getting closer to a toss up between Linux & Windows?

  • Thread starter Thread starter YKhan
  • Start date Start date
I'm still not convinced by Linux on the desktop yet, but this seems
like it might be getting closer. It's probably pretty important that
people move out of Windows before Vista arrives and they get stuck.

Yousuf Khan

Novell Shows Off Linux Desktop 10 - Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20060201/tc_pcworld/124571
Well.. I had it installed, (10.0) then tried to upgrade to 10.1 beta
that asked me for things, it deleted most stuff.
No I have installed grml linux from grlm.org.
It needs a lot of work, is debian based, and I replaced the X.org with Xfree,
ported most stuff now..
My view is (and has always been) that 'imitating MS windows' is like
aping a fool.
WHY would you want to make a topweight huge slow GUI while a command
line can actually understand what your write (nice for voice recognition too).
I am not recommending grml for office work :-) it is a sys adm tool (well
was, it is my desktop I am running now).
KDE and gnome are big and heavy.. I use fvwm now (the original).
And have 8 xterms, xfm and a decent pager in X.

So... immitating windows.. that really sucks, Linux was and is good because
of its possibillity for small and fast.

No, these guys (Novell Suse) go for the heavy stuff.
On the other hand .. what does one expect in an offce? I have staroffice
installed, sql ledger, phpPgAdmin.
Plus 799 scripts I made (just counted these).
So 799 extra commands I can type, how about 'show bbc4" (it wil start xine
on digital satellite with bbc4).
How about speaking 'show ard1' (perlbox voice).
So multimedia PC too....
Who needs such a dinosaur MS windows desktop clone, one screen with icons and
some xterms or rxvt is much more practical.
And I am in the middle of it.
When we see the 100$ PC with Linux, then I sincerely hope it runs Xfree with
fvwm and a 9 field pager (virtual screens).
There is the other guy, the one who was wrong about 64 k is enough for anyone,
internet is nothing, DVD is out, Linux is no thread, who now wants the 100$ PC
idea replaced by a cellphone with keyboard and display adapter? ???????
He is so out of touch with electronics... he claims the cellphone has a
computer in it.
True, microprocessor.. But a KEYBOARD ALSO has a microcomputer in it.
So then make a keyboard with a programmable processor.
Maybe Billy thinks the OS will run in JAVA on the cellphone...... Then it
would indeed approach MS speed.
My cellphone runs java.....
LOL
Billy EVERYTHING including 'mama' dolls has a microprocessor in it these days.
Why not use a mama doll...
Nuf said .
 
YKhan said:
I'm still not convinced by Linux on the desktop yet, but this seems
like it might be getting closer. It's probably pretty important that
people move out of Windows before Vista arrives and they get stuck.

(1) I've been convinced by Linux on the desktop for a decade now.
Generally when people point to the applications that they need
Windows for (no. 1: Word), they're talking about exactly the
applications that sent me screaming in horror a decade ago. And
they've only gotten worse since.

(2) The Windows people I know are already so stuck that Vista won't
make a difference.
 
YKhan said:
I'm still not convinced by Linux on the desktop yet, but this seems
like it might be getting closer.

When the last you tried it? It's very easy and risk-free with the new
"live" distributions that run off a CD. Ubuntu and Mepis both work
that way, and are also very easy to install to HD to get the full
effect.
 
chrisv said:
When the last you tried it? It's very easy and risk-free with the new
"live" distributions that run off a CD. Ubuntu and Mepis both work
that way, and are also very easy to install to HD to get the full
effect.

Actually, Ubuntu was the last one I used off of a live CD. Yes, it's
very easy to install and use. But I didn't try attaching everything,
like joysticks, driving wheels and scanners and stuff. Those are the
kinds of things that will probably hinder acceptance now. Oh yeah, and
SATA support.

Yousuf Khan
 
YKhan said:
I'm still not convinced by Linux on the desktop yet, but this seems
like it might be getting closer. It's probably pretty important that
people move out of Windows before Vista arrives and they get stuck.

(1) I've been convinced by Linux on the desktop for a decade now.
Generally when people point to the applications that they need
Windows for (no. 1: Word), they're talking about exactly the
applications that sent me screaming in horror a decade ago. And
they've only gotten worse since.

(2) The Windows people I know are already so stuck that Vista won't
make a difference.
 
Yousuf said:
Actually, Ubuntu was the last one I used off of a live CD. Yes, it's
very easy to install and use. But I didn't try attaching everything,
like joysticks, driving wheels and scanners and stuff. Those are the
kinds of things that will probably hinder acceptance now. Oh yeah, and
SATA support.

Yousuf Khan

I got perfect SATA support with OpenSuse 10.0, the 64-bit version, no less.

My problem is video codec support right out the box an MP3 decoding.

Still, I'm well on my way to being MS-free.
 
Yousuf said:
Actually, Ubuntu was the last one I used off of a live CD. Yes, it's
very easy to install and use. But I didn't try attaching everything,
like joysticks, driving wheels and scanners and stuff. Those are the
kinds of things that will probably hinder acceptance now. Oh yeah, and
SATA support.

What planet are you on? I bought my first SATA drive in 2003 and Linux
had support for SATA up and running by then.

CC
 
I got perfect SATA support with OpenSuse 10.0, the 64-bit version, no less.

Which SATA controller? SuSE 9.0 doesn't work with the SIL-3114. If
upgrading to 10.0 will fix the problem, will do!
My problem is video codec support right out the box an MP3 decoding.

It seems SuSE thinks playing DVDs is immoral.
Still, I'm well on my way to being MS-free.

....not free, by any means, though trying.
 
What planet are you on? I bought my first SATA drive in 2003 and Linux
had support for SATA up and running by then.
It seems to be a device driver issue (aren't they all?).
 
The said:
(1) I've been convinced by Linux on the desktop for a decade now.
Generally when people point to the applications that they need
Windows for (no. 1: Word), they're talking about exactly the
applications that sent me screaming in horror a decade ago. And
they've only gotten worse since.

(2) The Windows people I know are already so stuck that Vista won't
make a difference.
--
Joseph J. Pfeiffer, Jr., Ph.D. Phone -- (505) 646-1605
Department of Computer Science FAX -- (505) 646-1002
New Mexico State University http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~pfeiffer
skype: jjpfeifferjr
So what do you do when folks send you word files? Or Framemaker or Excel?
 
So what do you do when folks send you word files? Or Framemaker or Excel?

OpenOffice does pretty well with Word and Excel files. FrameMaker
files I read on AIX. ;-) (Actually I have a Windows Frame license
too.)
 
My problem is video codec support right out the box an MP3 decoding.
Dunno about 'right out of the box' but I do nice things with ffmpeg.
Did you try that?
H264 codec works its seems, there are amny codecs in ffmpeg.
use it in a pipe.

(And mplayer is build on ffmpeg for example).
 
On a sunny day (Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:50:21 -0600) it happened Del Cecchi

So what do you do when folks send you word files? Or Framemaker or Excel?
spam protection ;-)
IIRC my start-office reads word, so likely openoffice does too.
There is also a nice command line utility: wordcat.
 
Boney said:
I got perfect SATA support with OpenSuse 10.0, the 64-bit version, no less.

My problem is video codec support right out the box an MP3 decoding.

Still, I'm well on my way to being MS-free.

If you got one MPeg4 codec, you can pretty much do them all. I use Xvid
on one machine, ffdshow on another machine and divx in a third. But what
about H.264? Are there Linux codecs for those yet?

As for audio codecs, are there DTS and AC3 codecs available?


Yousuf Khan
 
magnate said:
What planet are you on? I bought my first SATA drive in 2003 and Linux
had support for SATA up and running by then.

Not in Ubuntu 5.10.

Yousuf Khan
 
Well.. I had it installed, (10.0) then tried to upgrade to 10.1 beta
that asked me for things, it deleted most stuff.
No I have installed grml linux from grlm.org.
It needs a lot of work, is debian based, and I replaced the X.org with Xfree,
ported most stuff now..
My view is (and has always been) that 'imitating MS windows' is like
aping a fool.
WHY would you want to make a topweight huge slow GUI while a command
line can actually understand what your write (nice for voice recognition too).
I am not recommending grml for office work :-) it is a sys adm tool (well
was, it is my desktop I am running now).
KDE and gnome are big and heavy.. I use fvwm now (the original).
And have 8 xterms, xfm and a decent pager in X.

The simple counter-argument to this is why bother worrying about
computing resources? Computers are DIRT-CHEAP to buy, people are
expensive. If a command line can allow you to work faster, great, all
the better. But arguing that KDE and Gnome are big and heavy is just
a reason to get rid of out-dated computers which generally cost
companies more in maintenance then buying new computers.

Seriously, beyond 3 years old PCs start becoming VERY expensive to
support. Either you need to buy extended warranties and/or contracts
from the vendor or you need to source the parts yourself (almost never
practical) or cannibalize PCs to keep them up and running. The latter
option can very quickly be ruled out because it increases the cost for
the most expensive resources a companies IT department can have, and
that is IT people themselves. Extended warranties/contracts from the
vendor are an option for up to about 5 years, but they quickly get
expensive.

So what is a 3-year old computer? For most companies that would be a
Pentium4 2.4GHz processor, 512MB of memory and a 40GB hard drive. If
this is your "low-end" system, you usually don't have to worry too
much about KDE or Gnome bogging things down. I run KDE on a similar
setup and it's pretty darn speedy.
 
The simple counter-argument to this is why bother worrying about
computing resources? Computers are DIRT-CHEAP to buy, people are
expensive. If a command line can allow you to work faster, great, all
the better. But arguing that KDE and Gnome are big and heavy is just
a reason to get rid of out-dated computers which generally cost
companies more in maintenance then buying new computers.

Seriously, beyond 3 years old PCs start becoming VERY expensive to
support. Either you need to buy extended warranties and/or contracts
from the vendor or you need to source the parts yourself (almost never
practical) or cannibalize PCs to keep them up and running. The latter
option can very quickly be ruled out because it increases the cost for
the most expensive resources a companies IT department can have, and
that is IT people themselves. Extended warranties/contracts from the
vendor are an option for up to about 5 years, but they quickly get
expensive.

So what is a 3-year old computer? For most companies that would be a
Pentium4 2.4GHz processor, 512MB of memory and a 40GB hard drive. If
this is your "low-end" system, you usually don't have to worry too
much about KDE or Gnome bogging things down. I run KDE on a similar
setup and it's pretty darn speedy.
All good and well, and those arguments make sense about old PCs, but that
is not the issue.

Imagine a screwdriver, JUST A BLOODY SCREWDRIVER.
You need one, but now all you can buy is an electric battery powered 5 gear
ultra high torque hyperspeed huge monster.
Sure, there are applications for that, but many more for the simple
screwdriver.

Funniest thing, my (new) neighbour (well the one who bough the house just a
bit around the corner... he had one of those pneumatic hammers...
I went to look what all the noise was about... his walls (most of it anyways)
he had torn down with it.....
And I wondered and I wondered.... ????
So, yesterday he was placing a big mobilhome in his garden... asked him...
'Yes it got a bit out of hand'.
So people like that should not be allowed access to power tools... just a
hammer would be bad enough.... LOL.
Makes you cry no?
So how does this relate?
Well, I compiled the new QT-4 2 days ago (You know that is what KDE (and open
suse) is build on.
It took several hours on a Duron 950, just for me to find out that is totally
different (making a new system) and incompatible with everything (other older
Qt applications) like for example the kernel xfonfig.
Just got 2.6.15.2 running now...... (menuconfig).
So all that new QT gives (check the demos) is some playing with graphics.....
layout...
Not worth the *****B*L*O*A*T*****

See, you claim about cost of PC maintenance contracts..... you seem to need P4
3.2 GHz dual core for email...
Sure most offices do NOT run video editing suites like I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

All Suse desktop does is ape Billy's windows.
If you want to start an application you have to work through menus.
If you want to INSTALL something (from DVD) you have a select 'Yast' that
takes ages to 'update and read database'.

Take a simple xterm, one virtual screen in fvwm.
You want to save money in your office?
See, there are a thousand or more
(
bash I hit tab 2 times)
Display all 6696 possibilities? (y or n)
)
programs -or commands I'd rather say- already on this NEW system (now up 3
days), if you want 'something' to run, you type in an rxvt:
something
It is not even in the menus.
Suse-7.2 was good.. 9.3 was already annoying (I had to support my soft on
it), Novel now created a monster with 10.X.
Like a child with a water head.
Some people need the screwdriver.
And Novell Suse will get much worse with QT4 and KDE you will need a quad
core Opteron 10 GHz soon.
To do what ???????????
To do what I do right now on a Duron 950.

So again, with the 100$ laptop coming, it should run Xfree and fvwm and will
likely outperform much.
When I go to the shop I can STILL get a simple screwdriver.
PC Industry got it all wrong.... That 100$ laptop will give it the shakes when i t shows the emperor without
clothes.

Some facts:
This system is up 24/7 now since august 2000.
With the same Seagate hardddisks (Tyan mobo).
ZERO problems, and it is on a vibrating wooden floor (people walk on that floor).
It has been exposed to anything between 2 C and 39 C.

I added a new Seagate disk some month ago, it is now past 'burn in' so it seems to work reliably too.
So now I am making a new sytem on this disk, and switching to it (have switched) as I expect hda
to reach end of design time one of these days, and then will just replace it (all is backup'd).
(I can run any other - there are several- version of Linux on several partitions on qemu any time from within
Linux).
I still have some partitions where I could try the next Suse-10.X NON BETA....
But if this system is up and running 100% (install freetype gtk pango atk cairo from source to get gtk working...
etc etc.. some work), we have PANTELTJE Linux here!!!

So, as to PC lifetime, yes Billy the Gates has you buy a new OS and new apps every few years...

But really the spreadsheet does the same... since the 80ties.. video came, but you want to keep the
girls in the office typing no? ;-) high speed sex animation websites and 'BOSS" button? huh?
LOL

Yes we NEED H264 in the office TODAY to be more productive.
Not even for the company server, no.

Screwdriver, software is a TOOL to do a JOB and i ahev always written it for just that purpose.
And for the fun of it too, and it is no fun with a 4 hour compile QT.
It makes no sense, waite of resoruces, can be done better, different.

But thse companies (started with RatHead libc compatibility prpblems DELIBERATLY make things
so they have MARKET PROTECTION.
For that reason you see more and more simple Linux distors by people who just want performance,
a custom system,. no bloat.
grml.org is one for example.
These will win in the end, the bloatware will go Billy's way..
natural forces will clean this out.
Power consumption too.
What you electricity bill for runing 20 P4 3.2 GHz in the office + 3 high performance servers each year?
When it can be done with 10 cheaper machines (all of it)?
Substract difference and when the bean counters get the idea things will become more real.
 
Back
Top