I love this logic.

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Corliss
  • Start date Start date
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 21:19:47 +0100, Andy Mabbett
Typo ? As you complain about a non existent problem you should have
said "I" instead of "You".
Though many would say that for people that complain about non existent
problems, like yourself, "seem to be" is also incorrect.

Saying "seem to be" would seem to make him delusional, wouldn't it?
 
Al Klein said:
Andy, you aren't capable of telling the difference between me thinking
and me not thinking.

Quite possibly - the difference seems undetectable.
 
Why do people care which masochist I beat on? Andy seems to love
being the beatee.

Al, with all due respect for the good help you provide the group,
you've got to be one of the most trollable people on Usenet.
 
Andy said:
Yup, Corliss' sig is still broken.

So here we are, almost a week later. Everyone but Muppet Mabbett
reckons John's sig is fine, and performs properly.
This leaves 3 possibilities:-
1/ Mabbet's got it wrong and there's nothing wrong with John's sig.
2/ Mabbet knows there's nothing wrong with the sig, and is just trolling.
3/ That there *is* something wrong with the sig. But as he is unable
or unwilling to say what it is, and no-one else believes that it is,
we can discard this possibility.

I guess that means Mabbett assumes he's the only man in the squad
who's marching in step. We had a word for people like him when I was
in the Services.
Andy, put up, shut up, or bog off!
 
Why do people care which masochist I beat on? Andy seems to love
being the beatee.

I don't care what you get up to in the privacy of your own home - it
just gets rather tedious when you do it here, as others have
commented.

Regards,
 

You're going to have to do MUCH better than that, Andy, if you want to
get up to the level that you get laughed at. (Yes, being laughed at
would be an improvement over your current state.)

You're going to have to AT LEAST tell us WHAT the problem in John's
sig is. Barring that you're just a 3-year-old throwing a tantrum.
 
Al, with all due respect for the good help you provide the group,
you've got to be one of the most trollable people on Usenet.

You don't like the way I play with my toys?
 
I don't care what you get up to in the privacy of your own home - it
just gets rather tedious when you do it here, as others have
commented.

I can write the filter for this subject for you if you like. It's
trivial.
 
You don't like the way I play with my toys?

Nah, I don't care about the way you like to toy with and be toyed with
by Andy or the Tesla guy or whomever. I was just pointing out how easy
it is for them to hook you. Your notion that you are "beating" them
explains much. Carry on, EOT for me.
 
Al said:
You don't like the way I play with my toys?

Al Klein, you are a wanker.
There have been 17 posts by you in this thread, every single one
completely useless, worse even: just feeding the Mabbett troll.
And all the time you're thinking that you're impressing people?
What an egotistic bonehead!
 
Sietse said:
Al Klein, you are a wanker.
There have been 17 posts by you in this thread, every single one
completely useless...

Wonder what the newsgroup would be like if we all switched to decaf...

-Craig
 
There 'a difference between "beating" and "beating on". A big
difference.

Sorry, it was a typo. I meant to say your notion that you are
"beating on" them explains much. And you're right, it does make
quite a difference.
 
Back
Top