P
POKO
and over and over and over and who the **** really cares escept thisHe's not saying that. He just says over and over that your sig is
broken.
dimwit,
and over and over and over and who the **** really cares escept thisHe's not saying that. He just says over and over that your sig is
broken.
And according to your quote, Andy is saying that a standard line is
60 characters long.
and I've read that even up to 79 characters is considered acceptable.
Using that guideline, my sig is only three lines long
Even if you do include the two dashes
In message <[email protected]>, John Corliss
and still broken and dishonest.
Perhaps you would.
You'd be looking in the wrong place, though.
Andy, blaming John for what your client is doing is the dishonest
thing here.
Al Klein said:I think the original "complaint" was lack of a space at the end of the
tear - which you had (a space, not lack thereof), and the complainer's
client evidently dropped.
Al Klein said:Andy, blaming John for what your client is doing is the dishonest thing
here.
Al said:It was originally 80 characters minus whatever you left for quoting.
Most of us set to 72.
And all this is for a monotype font on an 80
character display - it has nothing to do with Windows or X.
If there's only 1 level of quoting.
Number of lines is number of lines - it has nothing to do with how
many characters are on the lines.
Your longest line is 70 characters and you have 3 lines of sig, so
your sig is within guidelines.
That's the tear - it's not part of the sig.
Were I doing so, it would be. I'm not.
You think wrong, then.
I'm using Thunderbird 1.5.0.4. Under:
Tools/Options/Composition/General
I've always had the setting under "Wrap plain text messages" set to 72.
Unless I'm missing something, this is where that setting is located. If
there's a problem with how my messages come out when viewed and it's the
fault of TB, there's nothing I can really do about it except post a bug
report.
Right. I should have been more clear that the max limit included carats
and spaces. But if somebody wants to quote my signature file (which is
usually not supposed to be done) then the fault would lie with that person.
In the case of my sig file, line length determines how many lines the
sig file is because the second line wraps.
Yes, but I was giving Andy the benefit of the doubt. 80)>
Al Klein said:Since there's nothing else "wrong" with your copies of John's posts,
you're admitting that you're just complaining about nothing.
Al Klein said:I don't think he wants it
I think he wants something to complain about.
Al Klein said:Since John's posts have no problem, either your reader is breaking them
or you are. There's not much else left. Since your client isn't the
problem (you'd know how it's configured better than I would), I take
that as a confession of wrong-doing.
Since John's posts have no problem, either your reader is breaking
them or you are. There's not much else left. Since your client isn't
the problem (you'd know how it's configured better than I would), I
take that as a confession of wrong-doing.
You seem to be delusional.
In message <[email protected]>, Al Klein
Liar.
I don't need it.
That's you *not* thinking, again.
You seem to be delusional.
<snip>
Why do people persist in pandering to Mabbett's affectations?
It should be patently obvious with very little research just what the
odious cretin's agenda is.
If you prefer a more technical example of his ineptitude