I do not understand the negatives for Vista .. new computer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telstar
  • Start date Start date
zuoer said:
ITS CRAP!

That's suppose to be *IT'S CRAP*, but we know you were talking about
yourself, and you were giving yourself the benefit of the doubt.

But you are troll *CRAP* no doubt about it. And the only thing you look
at is the crap from your a-hole when you flush the commode.
 
Alex....

XP was based on windows 2000, and XP is still so good they just
released a version of XP, (yes a new version that just went gold)
that is made for low powered machines...
If XP was old and obsolete why did Microsoft do that? The truth is
that its not obsolete.

When you compare windows Me with XP, its like night and day.. the
first had a kernel bases on 9x technology and the second is based on
NT kernel...

If you would install windows 2000 on that old machine, it would work
far better than having windows Me...
The only thing you must have in mind is that winMe needed 32 mb
minimum while win2000 needed 64 megs.

and then there is a version of XP specifically made for older
hardware, to be exact, for corporations that have outdated hardware
yet want the extra functionality of XP compared to windows 2000. This
version of XP is called XP fundementals... and of course I have
tested this also...

Now with Vista what do you have? You have basically no additional
functionality compared with xp, but at the same time you have
hundreds if not thousands of problems and drawbacks.

Its badly designed, the interface has problems that a person with
proper perception sees right away.. for example I needed only a few
seconds to decide that vista is crap.
My opinion about it changed slightly after sp1.

And don't tell me about aero... If the shiny interface was all that
mattered then vista is just a pig with lipstick... and anyway, you
can have all those nice interface bells and whistles with XP too.

Then you might say media center that home premium has.. well XP media
center has that also... its basically XP pro with the media center
included....


I never admitted I lied because I didnt.... I EXAGGERATED, there is a
big difference.. its when you take the truth and make it so even
stupid people will understand what it is...
Unfortunate there are not the sharpest folk in here.. and when you
are dealing with idiots like frank.. well then you are dealing with
total morons...
Exaggeration is used in all art forms.... for a good reason: To get a
message across.


I know how to turn vista inside out if needed... it is because I have
a deep understanding of the OS, is why Im calling it crap.

You like it fine.. but you are rejecting new information not only
from me, If you don't believe me.. but almost everyone who is
respected in the field.

You don't have to believe me.. take a stroll on the internet and see
what everyone is saying about this pile if crap.

What a mental midget.
If you put as much thought into flipping burgers as you do whining
about Vista, you'd make $8.00/hr.

Vista is fine.
You aren't.

Ohh...I'll take a large Coke with that Whopper.
 
This being Usenet that "may" be true, but you see all kinds of claims here.
People are everything from secret agents to president of some un named
multinational corporation.Problem is many of them live in their Mothers
basement and work flipping burgers, but put on their cape and come here to
live a fantasy.

That's funny... and true. Take Frank for example. Mr. Business, so he
claims. I wonder how he looks in a cape and tights.
 
I was trying to be funny. I'm sure it was a "typo". He probably meant
Schmuck.

All basically interchangeable terms. Schmuck, Smuck, Putz, all more or
less meaning idiot or fool or a combination.
 
Ringmaster said:
That's funny... and true.

He talking about you.

Take Frank for example.

Take you for example.

Mr. Business, so he

Really? You love to put words in others mouths don't you mr drunken
lying pig.

I wonder how he looks in a cape and tights.

Not near as funny as you look, mr genius, bent over with bubba
driving!...LOL!
 
Ringmaster said:
That's funny... and true. Take Frank for example. Mr. Business, so he
claims. I wonder how he looks in a cape and tights.

Like that picture you keep in your wallet.
 
Ringmaster said:
All basically interchangeable terms. Schmuck, Smuck, Putz, all more or
less meaning idiot or fool or a combination.

You must hear them all quite frequently.
 
What a mental midget.
If you put as much thought into flipping burgers as you do whining
about Vista, you'd make $8.00/hr.

Vista is fine.
You aren't.

Ohh...I'll take a large Coke with that Whopper.

Hobbes, just another loser that knows next to nothing about computers
and Windows but like to pretend otherwise while flapping his gums and
hurling insults. Classic MS fanboy. They're a dime a dozen and all cut
from the same mold.
 
Ringmaster said:
Hobbes, just another loser that knows next to nothing about computers
and Windows but like to pretend otherwise while flapping his gums and
hurling insults. Classic MS fanboy. They're a dime a dozen and all cut
from the same mold.

I know way more than you, fat boy.
But you DO KNOW how to post to Usenet all day long.
You hit 100,000 post yet ?

That much time on Usenet, I'm sure you've copied and pasted tons of
info....that you then regurgitate as your own.

But...you know that.
 
I know way more than you, fat boy.

So you claim. Then again so does Frank and every other idiot I deal
with. Again, collectively the sum of your combined intelligence.
Pitiful. All you guys ever do is waste your time trying to discredit
me. You call that being productive?
 
Ringmaster said:
So you claim. Then again so does Frank and every other idiot I deal
with. Again, collectively the sum of your combined intelligence.
Pitiful. All you guys ever do is waste your time trying to discredit
me. You call that being productive?

I do know way more about my PC's than you.
It's no claim...its a fact.
I've also NEVER claimed (you did) that I was a computer expert.

Who are you dealing with ?

Oh, that's right....this is your life...you think you are "dealing" with me.
From what I see, you are responding to a character named Hobbes...reported
to be a stuffed tiger.

Discredit you ?
You get credits for this ?
 
Ringmaster said:
Hobbes, just another loser that knows next to nothing about computers
and Windows but like to pretend otherwise while flapping his gums and
hurling insults. Classic MS fanboy. They're a dime a dozen and all cut
from the same mold.

You just love to insult everyone who disagrees with you, you scared,
insecure little man. You are the real village idiot.
 
Read the true story about our resident village idiot.
The lying sick POS who used to go by the name adam albright. He now
calls himself "ringmaster", although the only ring he has is the one in
his noise.

By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics.

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank
 
By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics!

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank
 
Ringmaster said:
I use them frequently when addressing you. Frank ===> King of Putz.

Yes and it's proof that I own your pathetic loser ass.
You're a pig mr gotemeyer. A vile, stupid, ignorant big mouth pig of
human being.
 
I do know way more about my PC's than you.
It's no claim...its a fact.
I've also NEVER claimed (you did) that I was a computer expert.

Who are you dealing with ?

Oh, that's right....this is your life...you think you are "dealing"
with me. From what I see, you are responding to a character named
Hobbes...reported to be a stuffed tiger.

Discredit you ?
You get credits for this ?

Hobbes : 5 credits.
Ringmaster : 0 credits.

Hobbes: 2 extra credits for reminding Ringmaster that people who think
they speak for other people are delusional.

Ringmaster: -9 credits for being a boring blowhard whose idea of "being
productive" is to post almost 1/10th of a million times to Usenet.

Looks like the Ringmaster Albright is discredited.

Which ringmaster are you?
Frodo or Sauron ?
 
You just love to insult everyone who disagrees with you, you scared,
insecure little man. You are the real village idiot.

To disagree is fine, attacking the other poster is not. Every time you
do it or another fool does it, I do it to them. Damn Frank, that's the
game I've played with you and other idiots for over a year and you
still don't get it. Damn are you ever dumb. Now go crawl back in your
hole. It's past your bedtime old man.
 
Ringmaster said:
That's funny... and true. Take Frank for example. Mr. Business, so he
claims. I wonder how he looks in a cape and tights.

I would suspect that Frank's cape and tights are clean and relative new.
While yours on the other hand are worn, tattered and stink, due to over
worthless usage and you never changing your diaper, old Superman and a
Chicken Little.
 
Back
Top