Anonymous said:
I would like to make up calling cards at home using 8.5x11 sheets of
Avery precut cards. Templates are provided for Word & Word Perfect.
budgie said:
I know it's not the type of answer you were seeking, but IMOE I'd
rather buy cards ex Vista Print (
www.vistaprint.com) than bother
fiddling with printing my own. Check them out. (No affiliation
other than a more-than-once user.)
ben_myers_spam_me_not @ charter.net (Ben Myers) said:
I print out my business cards on 28 lb stock, a dozen at a time,
then slice them up with a paper cutter and a very steady hand.
Because I don't hand out business cards a lot, this works for me.
Why buy 500 or 1000 business cards with high odds of a phone number
or email change in this day and age? Maybe tomorrow I'll go VOIP,
sign up with another ISP, or do something else to make my business
cards obsolete... Ben Myers
budgie said:
At the price of the commercial product from Vista, I'm prepared to
take the risk of content obsolescence. There are "free" standard
layouts and 90% of the time their next tier is $US4 for 250 (both
plus postage). Beats the hell out of home brew for anyone with an
actual need for biz cards. But hey if it makes you feel good to do
your own printing/cutting then I'm happy for you.
I believe that there are other reasons besides a large backlog of
business cards for not wanting to change one's contact information
frequently. A major reason is that you would have to send new
business cards to people who have your old one. Unless they replace
your old one with your new one right away, it could become confusing
for them. If they have you in the organizer, they would have to
update that, too.
Having said that, however, I have to admit that I could be changing my
calling card somewhat frequently for the next little while. I am in
the information gathering phase of planning a next career step; the
details of how I want to present myself will become refined as I meet
with more professional practitioners to get their view on the
industry. Though my contact info remains the same, the content must
be agile -- not only will I change content frequently, and thus need
small quantities, it would be inconvenient to wait several days to get
revised cards.
I have done a cost comparison between printing & cutting my own cards,
printing onto Avery pre-perforated cards, and having a PDF printed and
cut by a local print shop. I am assuming 10 cards/page, though one
can squeeze out 12 with landscape layout; this is not generally
supported by professional print/cut shops.
1. Print & cut myself
---------------------
* 110 lb paper, pprox. $0.10/page
* Injet printing (OK, not super) about $0.07/page
* Assume cutter for 110 lb paper should be lever type, for clean
edge (minimum $50, upto $100+)
* Total: $0.17/page,
plus $50~$100 for a cutter (and space to store it)
2. Avery pre-perforated (clean edge)
------------------------------------
* $1.33/page
* Injet printing (OK, not super) about $0.07/page
* Total: $1.40/page
3. Print & cut by shop
----------------------
* $1.25/page (laser printed)
* $1.00 overhead to extract 10-up content from PDF file
- This is understandable. I spent a while just fiddling around
to find proper layout, which differed on the printed page
versus on-screen PDF (turned out to be a printer setting)
- Assuming 3 page/order, this adds 0.33/page
* $1.00/page to cut
* Total: $2.58/page, clean laser quality
4. Local Campus print shop
--------------------------
* $1.25/page
* $10 fixed cost on top of page charge
* Assuming 3 page/order, this adds $3.33/page
* Total: $4.58/page
For *self-printing* ink-jet quality, #1 is a clear winner for the
long-haul. For the immediate term, #2 is the clear winner. My
ink-jet (PSC-750) is pretty good. There is some fuzziness (more like
a softness) when the printed card is observed at regular viewing
distance. It is not until one scrutinizes the print up close that it
becomes clear that the outline of the letters are a bit "hairy".
For laser quality, #3 is the clear winner, though #4 *might* be more
likely to respond the same day rather then the next day.
So the strategy moving forward is to use #3 for the laser quality
(these things matter to the viewer at an unconscious level). If the
volume seems to be getting excessive, I can revert to #2, with the
associated drop in paper & print quality. For truely large volume or
long-haul, I'll drop to #1. #4 is a contingency for emergencies (and
it isn't even for sure that the turn-around time will be quicker than
for #3 -- it will probably be situation-specific).
Thanks for your thoughts on this.