Was it a blind test, or did you just decide on your own that you
could hear it? The so-called "placebo effect". It's hard to admit
you paid too much, much easier for the brain to convince you that
there is a difference.
In FACT, there are easily measured electrical and frequency
differences when the cable is longer, and/or higher gauge.
To ignore this would be to deny any benefit to digital
links. Cables DO degrade analog sound, sometimes enough to
hear it. That's not an argument for audiophile grade
cables, only one for sufficient spacing or shielding and low
enough gauge per application.
All 18ga copper wire is identical. Copper is an element, it doesn't
change physical properties just because someone wraps a beautifully
decorated piece of plastic around it instead of white.
NO, all 18 gauge wire is NOT identical. You know nothing
about wire or cabling for any use at all, let alone audio.
While it is not necessary to have a "pretty" decorated
covering over the cable or designer plugs, that does not
change the fact that wire gauge is but one parameter in it's
specs. Even so, the differences aren't so substantial when
considering speaker wire, make more of a difference the
smaller the gauge, as with replacing very cheap headphone
cables with (at least) moderate quality wire- not
necessarily audiphile wire, just something not optmized for
light weight and flexibility.
Of course. When you've been able to demonstrate that you can detect
a difference more than 75% of the time using an A/B/X test administered
by an unbiased professional, be sure and let us know though, it will
be earth-shattering news in the audio community and you'll be famous.
Don't thing that I'm arguing FOR expensive cabling, that is
a waste of $$$$. Below a certain point though it would
easily make an audible difference... for example running off
CAT5 or bell wire WILL sound worse than 12 gauge. There is
measurable signal loss, double-blind tests aren't even
needed.