Help my PC is dying of heat exhaustion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Desmond
  • Start date Start date
You are not alone.

My DreamPC for 2006 and fixed throughout the years also cannot handle
the heat.

Not even with an Antec 1200 case, somewhat cleaned.

At 27 celcius degrees, the CPU gets so hot that the motherboard's bios
shuts down the PC.

Presumably you've checked that the CPU fan (assuming there is one) is
running.

I had a problem of an overheating CPU some years back that I eventually
traced to inadequate thermal contact between the heatsink and the CPU.
Reapplying some heatsink compound solved the problem.

Sylvia.
 
My DreamPC for 2006 and fixed throughout the years also cannot
handle the heat.

Not even with an Antec 1200 case, somewhat cleaned.

At 27 celcius degrees, the CPU gets so hot that the motherboard's
bios shuts down the PC.

The temperature shutdown seems to be at 50 according to motherboard
settings.
Apperently the AMD X2 3800+ CPU is rated at about 85 watts or so...
apperently that's way too hot.

Try lowering the CPU core voltage, if the BIOS allows it, a little bit
at a time. When it becomes unstable, go back up a notch.
I settled on 1.425 volts for my AMD XP-Mobile processor installed in a
desktop pc.

Do the same with the memory voltage setting.
 
Got a CPU fan?

Remove it!
Look inside the heatsink to see if it is clogged with dust.
Vacuum or blow out.

Reinstall fan.

Run cool.

My PC had exaclty this problems; would shut down from heat.
So I cleanned the dust beteen the heatsink fins and the problem was
solved ... until next time.
 
With a thermistor or thermocouple probe,
<http://www.ebay.com/itm/220870280391>
measure the CPU case temperature, the heat sink temperature near the
CPU, the heat sink temperature near the air flow, the air temp near
the CPU fan, and the ambient air temperature.

Hey! It's Skybuck. Is he really going to perform all that without doing
damage?
 
I didn't bother re-appling the therman paste interface material as far as I
remember (just used the stuff that was on it... not believing the little
bubbles bs) or maybe I did...

I think I pulled of the whole thing for cleaning or so... and then put it
back on... or maybe not...

I don't think it's a thermal paste interface material probably because on
idle the temperature drops back to 32 degrees celcius or so... which to me
seems to indicate it's running as it would if it was applied fresh.

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
Right now it's 27.5 degrees celcius 0.5 degrees down from 28 degrees
earlier, so it's not 2 degrees hotter than yesterday.

Tomorrow it will probably be 30 degrees celcius.

I am not sure what the 50 degree shutdown is... maybe it's cpu temperature
or maybe it's motherboard temperature.

I don't think it's too low, it's rather high, I used to run at 45 degree
celcius as the max.

Computers/human beings are similar, at 43 degree celcius heat becomes
unbarreble for me.. still some beach go-ers like it.

At 50 degrees celcius people definetly start to die and so will computers.
So it's already too high I think...

Fact of the matter is, air cooling is simply not providing enough cooling
capabilities.

Even if all fans set at max there is only so much it can do.

I think liquid cooling will probably fail as well... the radiator would have
to be better than 8 fans all together ???

So far one solution mentioned is getting air conditioning... seems kinda
strange idea to me but ok.

I could try and build it into my appartment, draw back is if I move it might
be lost... or it could be moved not sure...

It will probably require extra power... there is a wall socket near the door
where it could be build above the door...
might look into this possibility.

Not sure if it will help much...

It better not require too much wattage... not sure if my appartment can
deliver enough power for all of these devices ;)

The motherboard is a winfast... the shutdown future is kinda cool... wish my
other motherboards had it... that could have prevented lots of motherboard
deaths.

CPU-Z shows: motherboard model: NF-CK804

Bios: Phoenix Technologies, LTD
Version: 6.00 PG
Date: 08/11/2005

This future is not on the top of my list for a next/new motherboard ;)

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
I already did that mostly...

Used vacuum cleaner to suck away dust... I know it's a bit dangerous but ok.

And blew the dust out...

It's probably 95% clean or so... should be enough.

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
I am also quite annoyed with AMD and their X2 processor.

The multiplier is locked as some of you know... so properly underclocking is
not possible.

The motherboard had two nice features:

CPU Clock Multiplier or something like that.

and

HT Multiplier.... (hyper transport)

First I tried HT... later I figured it was the wrong setting.

I didnt notice any performance degradation with HT running at 1x instead of
auto/5x ?

Maybe HT is for core to core communication... but I think it's main roll was
memory speed/bandwidth.

Didnt notice a thing... quite odd.

The HT multiplier was unlocked according to CPU-Z

Unfortunately the CPU multiplier not :( setting it to 5x or 4.5x or
something instead of 10x had no effect :(

I am not going to mess with voltages cause I dont know how to do that
properly... and certainly don't want to risk damage ;)

Just gonna wait for the night too cool down before I continue my gaming :)

Or maybe I do a low power game ;) :)

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
The drives in question, were a 2TB and a 3TB.

Paul

I've seen where 3Tbyte drives require non-legacy BIOS, either/or, and
W7, minimum;- except for one exclusive Seagate 3TB that is widely
mentioned as intended to format out for Win XP. The rest, there's a
few programs, offhand saw 3 or 4 larger known interests in the field,
with drivers as a solution to work within 3TB on XP. Some
manufacturers also claim to support XP, although except for Seagate
they're not as highly regarded, and possibly selling snake-oil for
those interested. Seems almost something along BluRay burners, which
will work, some evidently, given the right low-level drivers. Just
looking. . .I don't feel any pressing need to buy more than 2TB, and
BluRay discs are $4 for 100meg at optimistically 10 minutes "write
once" times -- roughly at parity to HD prices for the present (and,
yes, I'm aware 33% of computer users still use XP). I'd personally
doubt BluRay has as wide a presence, as wide as DVD's inception.

I'd mentioned this before, and it's looking more and more like a place
to be between a rock and hard place. HDs offer the performance value,
just not the failure safety net of BluRay, while at costs, consequent
sticking to HD backup media, at least duplicated, if enough to where I
may have to cull data for essentiality. More work - IOW, and not on
Easy St where everything just gets tossed for duplication.
 
Flasherly said:
I've seen where 3Tbyte drives require non-legacy BIOS, either/or, and
W7, minimum;- except for one exclusive Seagate 3TB that is widely
mentioned as intended to format out for Win XP. The rest, there's a
few programs, offhand saw 3 or 4 larger known interests in the field,
with drivers as a solution to work within 3TB on XP. Some
manufacturers also claim to support XP, although except for Seagate
they're not as highly regarded, and possibly selling snake-oil for
those interested. Seems almost something along BluRay burners, which
will work, some evidently, given the right low-level drivers. Just
looking. . .I don't feel any pressing need to buy more than 2TB, and
BluRay discs are $4 for 100meg at optimistically 10 minutes "write
once" times -- roughly at parity to HD prices for the present (and,
yes, I'm aware 33% of computer users still use XP). I'd personally
doubt BluRay has as wide a presence, as wide as DVD's inception.

I'd mentioned this before, and it's looking more and more like a place
to be between a rock and hard place. HDs offer the performance value,
just not the failure safety net of BluRay, while at costs, consequent
sticking to HD backup media, at least duplicated, if enough to where I
may have to cull data for essentiality. More work - IOW, and not on
Easy St where everything just gets tossed for duplication.

In WinXP, the Acronis virtual driver handles 3TB drives. Since
WinXP doesn't have GPT partitioning, that's what you use. Both
Seagate and Western Digital, offer an OEM version of Acronis TIH,
which includes that driver. While I think the idea has merit, the
implementation is terrible (lots of caveats, lots of opportunities
to lose access to the top 800GB of your 3TB disk). The Acronis package,
does not even include proper removal of the driver, if you uninstall
their hardware. That "feature", is what prevented TIH from working
the first time I tried it - a previous version of driver got installed,
from some other Acronis evaluation I'd done, and I had to roll back
my system to a two year old image, to get TIH to work properly.
So getting the new 3TB drive to work fully, was an epic adventure on WinXP.

http://imageshack.us/a/img805/4338/allocateinstall.gif

On the later OSes, you can use GPT partitioning, for access to the
whole thing.

And on Linux, while a 3TB drive may show up as 2.2TB by default,
you can actually pass a byte offset to the Linux mount command,
and attain read/write access to the upper partition that the
Acronis driver points you to in Windows. Only problem with
access that way, is for some reason the Linux software has
slow performance. Attempts to copy files while offset mounted,
result in 10MB/sec transfer rates (not even close to hardware
limited speed). The bottom 2.2TB area on the other hand, runs
at full speed (135MB/sec) under Linux.

Paul
 
Skybuck said:
I am also quite annoyed with AMD and their X2 processor.

The multiplier is locked as some of you know... so properly
underclocking is not possible.

The motherboard had two nice features:

CPU Clock Multiplier or something like that.

and

HT Multiplier.... (hyper transport)

First I tried HT... later I figured it was the wrong setting.

I didnt notice any performance degradation with HT running at 1x instead
of auto/5x ?

Maybe HT is for core to core communication... but I think it's main roll
was memory speed/bandwidth.

Didnt notice a thing... quite odd.

The HT multiplier was unlocked according to CPU-Z

Unfortunately the CPU multiplier not :( setting it to 5x or 4.5x or
something instead of 10x had no effect :(

I am not going to mess with voltages cause I dont know how to do that
properly... and certainly don't want to risk damage ;)

Just gonna wait for the night too cool down before I continue my gaming :)

Or maybe I do a low power game ;) :)

Bye,
Skybuck.

With Cool N' Quiet enabled, you can change the CPU multiplier.

If you entered the Windows control panel "Power", if you select the wrong schema,
it can leave the CPU running at full speed. Selecting a different schema,
gives Cool N' Quiet voltage and multiplier changes automatically. This
does not change the peak heat output, but improves thermal behavior
at idle. If you run Prime95, it will get just as hot.

If you use RMClock, you should be able to see the multiplier options.
If no options are visible (as in this picture), check your BIOS settings.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_pEfSMUbljUA/SpL8iTa_d7I/AAAAAAAAACY/Kj3D5Qj4L-U/s1600/t2400_rmclock.jpg

You can get RMClock here.

http://cpu.rightmark.org/download.shtml

With a little work, I expect you can create an RMClock schema, that
prevents the top multiplier from being used. And then, even running
Prime95, the temperature could be reduced. But you're not going to
like the reduced CPU performance.

AMD used to have a spec, where for each processor it showed the P-states.
That would explain the minimum and maximum multipliers used, when the
processor was tested at the factory. Most other listings you can find,
only list the maximum multiplier (for top CPU speed).

As an example, I can use a cpu-world.com entry. A 3800+ has a 2GHz CPU
internal clock, and a 200MHz base clock, for a peak multiplier of 10X.

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Athlon 64 X2 3800+ - ADA3800DAA5CD (ADA3800CDBOX).html

"In the minimum performance state (P-state) the processor runs at
1000 MHz and 1.1 Volt core voltage. Thermal Design Power in the
minimum P-state is 40.1 Watt"

That suggests the minimum CPU multiplier is 5X. And Cool N' Quiet
can vary the multiplier from 10X to 5X, while Windows is running.
The RMClock dialog box would show six rows of info, for the
allowed multiplier values.

*******

The HT multiplier, sets the clock for the Hypertransport bus. That
is the bus between the CPU and Northbridge. Setting the multiplier
to 1X instead of 5X, reduces bandwidth to your video card by a
factor of five or so. There is a second Hypertransport bus segment,
between the Northbridge and Southbridge. And you can fool around
with that if you want, as well.

The HT multiplier doesn't affect memory, since the memory controllers
are right on the CPU itself. Only the chipset bus bandwidth is affected
by HT.

A legitimate reason for reducing HT multiplier, is if you are
overclocking by raising the base clock on the CPU. If you raise the
base clock from 200MHz to 250MHz, you drop the HT multiplier from 5X
to 4X. Keeping a constant 1000MHz clock on the HT bus. That's the
basic idea. Hypertransport transfer rates, differ from one socket
to another, so my values listed here, are just to illustrate the
concept of staying below the limit for the bus. Some later AMD processors,
use a faster HT bus.

Paul
 
In WinXP, the Acronis virtual driver handles 3TB drives. Since
WinXP doesn't have GPT partitioning, that's what you use. Both
Seagate and Western Digital, offer an OEM version of Acronis TIH,
which includes that driver. While I think the idea has merit, the
implementation is terrible (lots of caveats, lots of opportunities
to lose access to the top 800GB of your 3TB disk). The Acronis package,
does not even include proper removal of the driver, if you uninstall
their hardware. That "feature", is what prevented TIH from working
the first time I tried it - a previous version of driver got installed,
from some other Acronis evaluation I'd done, and I had to roll back
my system to a two year old image, to get TIH to work properly.
So getting the new 3TB drive to work fully, was an epic adventure on WinXP.

http://imageshack.us/a/img805/4338/allocateinstall.gif

On the later OSes, you can use GPT partitioning, for access to the
whole thing.

And on Linux, while a 3TB drive may show up as 2.2TB by default,
you can actually pass a byte offset to the Linux mount command,
and attain read/write access to the upper partition that the
Acronis driver points you to in Windows. Only problem with
access that way, is for some reason the Linux software has
slow performance. Attempts to copy files while offset mounted,
result in 10MB/sec transfer rates (not even close to hardware
limited speed). The bottom 2.2TB area on the other hand, runs
at full speed (135MB/sec) under Linux.

Paul

Well, apart from buy a computer and building it to be compatible with
a HD, or ignoring breaking the unforeseeable limitation beyond 2.2TB,
this does not bode well. Acronis was no doubt one, besides software
packages, I mentioned available, others, not among what's obviously
included in the bulk-end of OEM packaging of such as NewEgg's
bargaining (where a retail box, horror of horrors, may run 50% more).

I've "heard that" - that without the correct geometry, at an 1:1
native, hardwired integral, transposition attempts can evince a
slowness to transfer speeds you're possibly reporting beyond a 2.2TB
in Linux - more of note would be "something of that," as I haven't
direct experience or extensively looked beyond my own self-imposed
limitations, seriously enough to consider buying above 2.2TB on these
platforms I'm on (a suitable elective for _Famous Last Words_).

I don't suppose you can report similar speed-throttling as an ad hoc
scenario within XP. . .

You know what's the worst, though. . .remember when implementing INT13
last time, (already long ago), for breaking a former HD storage
barrier, and how that was a two-edged facet, (either from a driver
standpoint, or, better yet, a controller card hardware equipped for
INT13), well, this time around there doesn't appear to be a stopgap
correlation to GPT, at least anything that I've yet to run into. That
in itself seems somewhat odd if at least to regard a viable market for
established but older PCs.
 
Yeah good thinking Paul.

The AMD X2 3800+ processor does have some kind of ability to scale
down/throttle down, just have to find how to do it. It's not via the bios
that's for sure... but this could be a benefit.

Apperently it's automatically supported, by the hardware/bios/windows 7.

Start->Control Panel->System & Security->Power Options->Power Saver->Change
Plan Settings->Change Advanced Power Settings->Processor Power
Management->Maximum Processor State->Setting

^ change this from 100% to 50% or 5% or so... 50 or 5 for this processor
doesn't matter it will go from 2 ghz down to 1 ghz which is nice... this
should make the processor run a lot cooler.

This is absolutely necessary for me for the coming days cause europe is
about to get the biggest heat wave since years. Probably 32 to 33 degrees
celcius tomorrow.

It will be interesting to see if my PC will boot at all or immediatly
shutdown... so I have to do this now... before I can't reach the setting
anymore... which is kinda interesting.

The bios method would have been faster... if I can't reach the windows
settings in time... then the PC would be stranded in heat.

Also the svhost.exe process consuming 50% energy during boot has not been
solved yet... I think you had some command for it to run each services in
it's own svhost.exe to see which is the culprit. Doesn't mean yet that the
problem can be solved but at least it would give me some idea where to start
looking.

It's either RPC, Power, Plug & Play... I know that much.

So that nasty bug could cause excessive heat leading to early shutdown.

I couldn't use live mail in 1 GHZ mode while that process was consuming all
50% so I put it back up to 2 GHZ so I can type this mail.

Usually the svhost.exe problem goes away after a few minutes. Then I will
turn down the setting to 5% or so... I will also try sleep mode instead of
shutdown... to try and prevent that service from rebooting and causing a
problem tomorrow.

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
And to reward you for your help, here is a little interesting screenshot:

http://www.skybuck.org/Winfast/TemperatureReadingsWith1GHZMode.png

The build-in cheap temperature meter in my Desktop Clock might be a few
degrees of when comparing with this screenshot which claims 30 degrees
temperatures as inputs.

Anyway... the svhost.exe has died down... so now it's very interesting to
try and game a bit and see what that does to game performance and
temperature ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
I didn't bother re-appling the therman paste interface material as far
as I remember (just used the stuff that was on it... not believing the
little bubbles bs) or maybe I did...

I think I pulled of the whole thing for cleaning or so... and then put
it back on... or maybe not...

I don't think it's a thermal paste interface material probably because
on idle the temperature drops back to 32 degrees celcius or so... which
to me seems to indicate it's running as it would if it was applied fresh.

Bye,
Skybuck.

The temperature elevation above ambient is the dissipated power divided
by the thermal resistance to ambient, so when it's idle, the temperature
elevation won't be high anyway. For example, if the thermal resistance
is twice what it should be, and (just pulling numbers out of the air for
illustrative purposes) the normal elevation on idle would be 2.5
degrees, then it will actually be 5 degrees - not much difference. But
if the elevation under computing load should be 20 degrees, it will
actually be 40.

I'm not clear what you mean by "little bubbles bs", but if you're
talking about literal bubbles in the thermal compound, it's clear that
they will indeed raise the thermal resistance, simply because they
reduce the area avaiable to conduct the heat, air not being a good
conductor.

Sylvia.
 
Micro/nano bubbles.

^ I don't really believe in it until proven ;)

I dont think there is difference between cleaning + smearing it vs or
pulling it off + smearing it a bit again + and pushing it onto it again.

The force is probably going to squash lot's of tiny little bubbles if there
are any at all.

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message

Right now it's 27.5 degrees celcius 0.5 degrees down from 28 degrees (...)
This future is not on the top of my list for a next/new motherboard ;)

Oh I see I made a little typo there... a common mistake.

I ment to write:

This Feature is now on the top of my list for a next/new motherboard ;)

The shutdown is quite nice... it alert me that there is a big heat related
problem ! ;)

Now it's solved for the mean time..

Played some frozen throne and company of heroes, so far no shutdowns...

And stutter/slow down is barely noticeable at least in a 2 v 2 or 1 v 1
hihihi.

What I would like to know is how WATT is transferred into HEAT.

Mostly for CPU and for GPU.

Anything else like memory chips and harddisks is extra.

For example: I wonder how much heat a top model of nvidia puts out ? It
claims it needs 300 watts of power... does this mean it outputs 300/84 times
that of a 84 watt haswell processors ?

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
Jeff said:
Instead wasting everyone's time writing all that irrelevant crap,

Skybuck is a troll, best ignored. You and Sylvia are wasting your time
responding to him.
 
Note that the GPU can run at up to 98C max.

What about the graphics card PCB and other components ?

What about the motherboard and components around it ?

Seems like this graphics card is designed to fry one's computer ?

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
Dot in the middle seems flawed to me.

It will not reach the corners and might leave big air gaps.

Which can then lead to excessive heat build up around corners and damage
capacitators around the cpu.

Bye,
Skybuck.
 
Back
Top