S Shawk Aug 9, 2007 #41 John said: UPDATE 9 August 2007 :- It appears that the Digitimes report on faulty 2400 and 2600 is totally incorrect and there never were any "in the wild" See:- http://www.dailytech.com/False+Alarm+Defective+Radeon+Report+Completely+Untrue/article8374.htm Click to expand... How have Digitimes excused themselves on this one? I did have a look (there's a link to related stories from the original) but it's subscribers only. Anyone?
John said: UPDATE 9 August 2007 :- It appears that the Digitimes report on faulty 2400 and 2600 is totally incorrect and there never were any "in the wild" See:- http://www.dailytech.com/False+Alarm+Defective+Radeon+Report+Completely+Untrue/article8374.htm Click to expand... How have Digitimes excused themselves on this one? I did have a look (there's a link to related stories from the original) but it's subscribers only. Anyone?
