M
measekite
fb said:Yeah that idiot actually considers himself to be an expert on all
things that have to do with printing.
What a joke he is! What a liar!
Frank
YOU SHOULD NOT TALK ABOUT YOURSELF DAT WAY
fb said:Yeah that idiot actually considers himself to be an expert on all
things that have to do with printing.
What a joke he is! What a liar!
Frank
1. A printer's warranty isn't void by the use of aftermarket inks. In
America this would be a violation of Federal Law {MAGNUSON-MOSS
WARRANTY IMPROVEMENT ACT) which should be handled by the FTC. Other
countries have similar provisions. Now if the damage was caused by 3rd
party inks and it can be proven the same damage wouldn't happen with
OEM ink... then yes they decline warranty service legaly. In practice
this does not happen.
2. *NOWHERE* and I mean NOWHERE does the warranty expressly say that
the use of third party products voids the warranty. Even if there
was... it would be in total violation of Federal Law in America... as
well as laws in other respective countries. Measekite was nice
enough to conferm that under Canon's warranty so long as the product
doesn't cause excessive returns the warranty is NOT void.
3. The only person having a tizzy is Measkite. This diatribulation is
all about some guy who thinks his warranty on his epson was void as a
direct result of 3rd party ink use. This is the sort of thing that
needs to be reported to the FTC because it can easily be proven that
Epsons like most inkjets do clog as a direct result of normal use.
Interesting. I'm not really sure what it is. Looking at the current one
with a flashlight, it looks like a dark thin trail or dried ink down
the side, and some lighter colored, fluffy stuff around the bottom of
it.
measekite said:YOU SHOULD NOT TALK ABOUT YOURSELF DAT WAY
BOY THAT IS A QUICKIEmeasekite wrote:
Who's having a tizzy? You are the only one screaming in capitals.
Not that you care, but I'm a she.
HE AS A SPECIAL CASE SO IT CAN BE SAID IT IS
Um. It is NOT a laboriou pain. I can fill an ink tank in less than 2
minutes. No big deal.
That's about a minute longer than getting out a
brand new one. And about 30 minutes LESS than it takes to drive to the
store and back. And considering that most of my ink tends to run out
when I am really busy, or late at night when the stores close, it's a
lot more convenient to have plenty of ink right here.
For the same price of a complete set of new OEM cartrudges, I can buy a
complete set of bottled ink - that's 8oz each of cyan, magenta,
yellow, photo cyan, photo magenta, and 16 oz of black.
I can refill all of the tanks in the house, including my spare set, in
less than 15 minutes. So, usually, I can switch out tanks rather than
fill each time I run out.
I realize you are obsessed with attacking this idea, but why do you
think it is so difficult to do? Isn't the trip to the store more of a
hassle?
Burt wrote:
Yes, I know. But I figure we have to undo his damage as others will be
searching these newsgroups looking for advice later, and I'd rather
they find a variety of success stories.
NEVER HEARDTHAT ONE WITH CANON, EPSON, OR HP INK BUT I GUESS IT HAPPENSTaliesyn wrote:
Yes, it is odd, but two of them have had mold growing in them. Granted,
they were probably close to empty for awhile before I pulled them out.
I was really surprised about the first one. I didn't realize it was
possible. The second one, I just found a couple days ago. There is a
small amount of mold in it. So, I'll chuck it and get another one.
He's probably drunk, on drugs or both. He is by far the dumbestI haven't seen anybody insist that YOU should start refilling ink. I do
see YOU trying to stop everybody from refilling ink.
Honestly, if you don't use your printers that much, why do you spend
so much time trolling a printer newsgroup?
For the first time in 12 years of usenet, I've just killfiled someone
for persistently posting in all caps. Good times.
there are a bunch of idiots that disagree and call anyone who disagrees with
then name. they are certainly an abusive bunch
<snip>And to make things worse, you go on like ravid aardvark on
steroids
In message said:It's a theory that Canon hired out a viral advertising agency who
employs people to spam the groups. It sounds silly but considering
that young people don't spend as much time watching TV as they once
did... they have to plug their product somehow and it's been known to
happen some joe/jane take a perfectly inocent blog site and make it
into the splitting image of the marketing spew on the offical website.
There is no evidence to back this up other than the fact that this
person plugs Canon 10 times a day, and plugs OEM inks every time
someone asks a technical support question... software related onces.
He's probably drunk, on drugs or both. He is by far the dumbest
psychopath to ever post in any ng I've seen to date.
Oh I don't know, have you tried some of the scarier religious newsfroups?
In message <[email protected]>,
Personally, I think it is more likely that he is an employee of Epson
or HP, attempting to put people off Canon by providing an example of
their typical user!
Measekite speaking in tongues. He is the new textbook case for demonicARE U REFERING TO DA CHURCH OF DA LATTER DAY INKIE STINKIES
OR DA CHURCH OF REFILLERS ANONYMOUS
DA ANONYMOUS IS DA INK DAY USE CUSE DAY DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS
WE NEED AN EXORCISM. WE NEED TO EXORCISE THE BAD PRINTER CLOGGINGRon said:Measekite speaking in tongues. He is the new textbook case for demonic
possession.
Aftermarket in?WE NEED AN EXORCISM. WE NEED TO EXORCISE THE BAD PRINTER CLOGGING
AFTERMARKET IN FROM THE PRINTER AND REPLACE WITH GENUINE OEM CARTS