R
R. J. Sutherland
Ron, have you and your fellow advocates not realised that there is a logical
inconsistency in your position? You have argued that superficially unnecessary
BIOS updates are in fact absolutely essential because more is being fixed than
the published fix-list indicates, yet you also seem to have absolute faith that
the update will actually be an improvement. Even if the flash is successful, and
really does fix some bug you never even knew you had, what's to guarantee that
it won't also introduce some very real problem with whatever other changes come
along with it? If you truly believe that BIOSes are so buggy that they need
regular upgrading, how can you possibly have such optimistic faith in the newer
versions produced by the exact same people? (Your argument reminds me somewhat
of Microsoft's widely-discredited "marketing" strategy of praising their latest
version of Windows to the skies then later dissing it as useless and awful as
soon as the next version comes along...)
inconsistency in your position? You have argued that superficially unnecessary
BIOS updates are in fact absolutely essential because more is being fixed than
the published fix-list indicates, yet you also seem to have absolute faith that
the update will actually be an improvement. Even if the flash is successful, and
really does fix some bug you never even knew you had, what's to guarantee that
it won't also introduce some very real problem with whatever other changes come
along with it? If you truly believe that BIOSes are so buggy that they need
regular upgrading, how can you possibly have such optimistic faith in the newer
versions produced by the exact same people? (Your argument reminds me somewhat
of Microsoft's widely-discredited "marketing" strategy of praising their latest
version of Windows to the skies then later dissing it as useless and awful as
soon as the next version comes along...)