kony said:
I never claimed "rebadged". Reread it.
OK. The photos that you provided links to HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE
S610 OR S12-600, PERIOD, thus, do not support your claim that the
S610 is even built by Seasonic.
Nope, you're just a horribly confused person who doesn't
even know what "more expensive" or "made by" means.
Still trying to convince yourself of those things? You've provided
no evidence here of either. That tells me YOU'RE either confused,
ignorant, or just trolling.
Yes, you are trying to claim I need to prove something to
you. You can't even concede that the Seasonic costs less
which any gradeschool child can see, so obviously anything
more complex will only befuddle you.
I have conceded that the RETAIL price of the S610 is more than
the DISCOUNTED price of the Seasonic. Comparing the price on an
apples to apples basis is a concept than seems to befuddle you.
Yes, they do come very close. Minor variations in chassis
to fit a different fan more than anything.
Ah, edited AGAIN what I actually wrote, that the *pictures* don't
even come close to supporting your claim. Once again:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You just need to provide evidence when you offer your *opinion*
as fact. I have not argued "pro-PCP&C" or "anti-PCP&C." I have
argued - correctly so - that your evidence does *NOT* support
your argument. For example, your pictures of the "350" and "410"
labeled PSUs, along with the "PC Modding Malaysia" and "S470"
PSUs do not support your claim that the PCP&C S610 is just a
rebadged Seasonic S12-600. They don't even come close. But yet,
you insist these photos prove your point. Pathetic, really.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Go ahead. Edit it again. And you call the variations "minor."
And you forget to address the output current differences or
the harness differences. Just "minor variations in chassis."
Yeah, right.
So what you're REALLY saying is, you have no evidence of
anything at all, and just feel like wasting everyone's time
because it doesn't even MATTER who made it, only what it
actually is, the final product.
What I said is quite clear. You have no evidence to support your
claim. *I* didn't make a claim either way concerning the S610,
you did. It's up to *you* to give evidence to support your claim.
I probably should have edited everything you wrote so it
read more like this:
"So you disagree, what do I care if you can't even provide
one single link".
So it reads like *I* wrote that? Nah, you provided plenty of links.
Problem is that none of them tie the S610 to the S12-600 - even
remotely.
So even when you're going to spend time on the thread, you
don't find evidence of any kind, you just act like a fool.
You made the claim. You provide the evidence. Simple concept, really.
You're squirming now and we both know why.
You were making up nonsense and have no support at all for
what you wrote. I even offered to link more but you
couldn't even be bothered to provide EVEN ONE SINGLE LINK.
A link to what? *YOU* made the claim. *YOU* provide the evidence.
If you have any evidence that the S610 is actually a S12-600,
POST IT! But you don't. That's MY claim.
After all this typing you've done we have to assume you're
as dumb as a rock to continue whining as if it somehow
improves your position instead of providing ACTUAL LINKS.
We have to assume that *you* are just trying to shift the focus
away from your claim that the S610 is just a S12-600, because
you're just blowing hot air. I made no claim regarding the origin
of the S610, only that you had no evidence to back YOUR claim.
Watching you wiggle has been hilarious.
Once you provide some, then I'll give you a few more.
You have to make the slightest bit of effort if you want to
be taken seriously.
Provide some what? Links to my claim of the origin of the S610, a
claim that I haven't made? And you have *more*? More that are as
unrelated to the two PSUs in question as your pictures?
Already showed how their output current couldn't be correct.
Yeah, yeah. And I explained that UL disagreed, you argued illogically
for a while and dropped the subject. You can run, but you can't hide.
Do you have any idea how trivial it is to put a different
fan on? Did I ever write that they are exactly identical?
No.
Well, when one is a rear mounted 80mm fan, and one is a bottom
mounted 120mm fan, it's less trivial. Whole new chassis required.
Reread the above a few times because you seem a slow
thinker.
I suggest you do the same.
They are comparable PSU made by same company.
And you've provided *NO* evidence to support this claim.
While the PC
P&C unit initially appears to have higher 12V rating, that
directly conflicts with the other data on the spec sheet
such that it can't be sustained in use, is not an equivalent
rating system.
If UL says it is 49 amps continuous, I'll believe them. If it was
peak, they'd have to label it as peak.
You don't know beans about PSU do you?
Ah, your old standby. Took you a while to revert to it. Shows the
level of desperation you are now experiencing.
Poor Kony. Better stop making claims you can't support with
evidence.