S Sunny Apr 6, 2006 #21 Mike said: Sunny By system, I was referring to system hardware, ie motherboard and its functions.. the system as a whole does indeed benefit.. Click to expand... If you say so ;-) I remain unconvinced - I don't see how it is possible for the system to benefit in any way from memory it cannot address. Sunny
Mike said: Sunny By system, I was referring to system hardware, ie motherboard and its functions.. the system as a whole does indeed benefit.. Click to expand... If you say so ;-) I remain unconvinced - I don't see how it is possible for the system to benefit in any way from memory it cannot address. Sunny
B Bob Willard Apr 7, 2006 #22 John said: so you are claiming that 1.25 GB of ram cannot be addressed???? That sounds like hogwash to me and hogs dont wash that fequently! Click to expand... Cannot be addressed by applications running under this copy of XP as configured.
John said: so you are claiming that 1.25 GB of ram cannot be addressed???? That sounds like hogwash to me and hogs dont wash that fequently! Click to expand... Cannot be addressed by applications running under this copy of XP as configured.
