No twist. You are likely one of those cowboy developers. My guess anyway.
Don't like processes that are repeatable and well defined.
Lets hope you never write code for something that results in life or death.
Or losing a billion dollar ship for a couple of bucks of structured software
development.
Hey Scotty, come up and replace this NT DLL or hard drive so we can launch
these damn things...whew...scary thought with a SU 30 or SU 47 coming at
you.
At no stage did I say that. I use such processes. Please quote me saying
otherwise.
Lets hope you never write code for something that results in life or death.
Or losing a billion dollar ship for a couple of bucks of structured software
development.
hate to tell you old bean but I have worked on just such. And under
tight, tight process control.
Why are you slinging allegations around?
The issue at debate here is this silly claim about "Loose MS standards"
and Hilliards ridiculous boasting about how he selects the best OS
*AFTER* he has manged these mega projects to completion.
At least you'll be more productive than you are in Linux.
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.