I'm not sure what flaw you're referring to: could you clarify?
I may not be the brightest bulb in the shed, but given a good pointer I can
probably fix whatever 'constant crashing' you're pointing to or triage it
appropriately. Constant crashes sound like something that would be good to
be fixed. Given that your previous crashing was in a bogus third party DLL,
though --
You sound like Bush. For over a year he said he wouldn't help the
troubled banks and just watched as one after another crashed never
seeing the CAUSE was his inept team of bone headed financial advisors
sitting on their hands or at best offering band aid fixes one at a
time.
Then a scary think happened. Something that never happened before in
financial history. A major Money Market fund reported the NAV of their
fund went below a dollar. To avoid a run on money market funds that
have trillions of dollars and cause a 1929 type crash the feds had no
choice but to quickly say they would bail out not just a few troubled
banks but the whole shit load of them to finally get a handle on the
credit crisis.
Now the taxpayers will likely get a trillion dollar bill to fix the
mess. Maybe Microsoft should take a hint and look INWARD and oh my
God, discover many of the problems that plague Windows is due to bugs
in Windows. Just admit it's true, can you? I doubt it. Like the Feds,
Microsoft employs the band aid approach. How many hundreds more bugs
remain in Vista?
I don't see why it'd matter: MVPs are picked for just being generally
excellent helpful people, not for goose-stepping to some imaginary party
line. Exposure to more experiences allows you to potentially provide better
more interesting feedback. Competition is an opportunity.
Yea right. A guess you don't read the goose stepping MVP's that post
to this newsgroup. They're a riot. You should read the slop they
write.
Counter-point: if you do know more about Windows, what specific crashes have
you triaged from the event viewer fault data and led to any sort of specific
resolution?
You expect me to fix Vista? Give me a billion dollars and I'll give
it a shot.
Just once... try to be objective. If Windows Explorer crashes shortly
after booting from a cold start and NOTHING else is running other than
the shell itself except for TSR's like anti virus and a couple other
things that have nothing to do with file handing, that cuts your
feeble attempt to not blame Vista right off at the knees. I've seen
Explorer whine it needs to shut down right after clicking on it's
shortcut to fire it up. Haven't even asked Explorer to do a damn thing
yet, don't even get the chance, it already has throw up the moronic
needs to close window or Vista tries to launch Explorer and it dies
right after. Obviously others have seen this too, but you remain in
denial.
Here's something else for you to chew on. Vista is so poorly written
it now can force a bogus "not responding" error when it fact the
application is still loading. One example I've seen this happen with
more than once is Adobe's Photoshop. The FACT is there is nothing
wrong and if you wait, Photoshop will load normally, yet dumb as dirt
Windows Vista is already signaling something is wrong went there isn't
by tossing out a stupid not responding message. If you didn't know it
was in fact Vista just being stupid, you would try to force Photoshop
to shutdown when it isn't necessary.
Want more? Glad to educate you on how screwed up Vista really is.
I've used Forte's outstanding Agent (newsreader) for over fifteen
years. They do a excellent job in debugging and their software is as
bug free as any I've seen. Even since using Vista if I select some
headers to delete them and select one, then scroll down to include
more by the time I have got a couple hundred or so I often am able to
force a 'not responding' message from the application. Something it
never did under XP. Apparently the time length is the issue, Vista
seems to wrongly assume it is hung up when it isn't and the
application's window whites out. The telltale sign it likely is Vista,
not Agent, is if you wait and do nothing, the screen will return to
normal and you can proceed, if you select a few hundred more it will
throw another not responding message.
My favorite Vista screw up is if I accidentally select a group of
files that are images and as a group launch the first Vista will go
into a nervous breakdown and instead of being smart enough to sequence
through the other images selected as they get decoded and displayed
one after the other it being STUPID instead launches more and more
instances of Photo Gallery until it overwhelms resources and Vista
first slows to a crawl, then if enough images were in the group locks
up Photo Galley. Again, it didn't happen in XP. At least it was smart
enough to cycle through the images and display each in turn in ONE
instance of the image viewer, not try to launch a 100 or more
instances of the viewer which surely will crash it if over taxed.
Want more stupid Vista failings? I could give your hundreds. Just ask.
If you did actually know "messed up areas" of Windows, you should point
those out.
Just did.
Otherwise... it pleases me that trolls have to make stuff up at
this point because their other real actual criticisms aren't meaningful
enough.
Go ahead, take a cheap shot. Anybody pointing out flaws in Vista is a
troll. Sure. I probably know more about how Windows works then you do.
Make stuff up my ass. You're seen as a joke. You do know that don't
you Z? You can't even bring yourself to admit Vista has bugs. That
makes you just another laughing stock and you have the same
creditability as the idiot Frank, another worshiper of Microsoft.