B
Bazzer Smith
Rod Speed said:
In which case it is not :O)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
In which case it is not :O)
D
dng
well, catalyst sucks. this 24" monitor is beautiful though, i dont
understand why widescreens are becoming so popular when the high
majority of websites still cater to 800x600 or 1024x768, i just have
tons and tons of dead space to the left and right. anyways, i tried
pivot pro trial, and it worked like a charm. ati needs to improve
catalysts interface and usability significantly.
understand why widescreens are becoming so popular when the high
majority of websites still cater to 800x600 or 1024x768, i just have
tons and tons of dead space to the left and right. anyways, i tried
pivot pro trial, and it worked like a charm. ati needs to improve
catalysts interface and usability significantly.
B
Bazzer Smith
well, catalyst sucks. this 24" monitor is beautiful though, i dont
understand why widescreens are becoming so popular when the high
majority of websites still cater to 800x600 or 1024x768, i just have
tons and tons of dead space to the left and right. anyways, i tried
pivot pro trial, and it worked like a charm. ati needs to improve
catalysts interface and usability significantly.
Widescreen is derived from the restricted view in a cinema above the heads
of the people sitting in front of you.
Some people think it art, as the director intended etc.. but I know it's
crap.
It is a waste of space literally!
K
kony
Well it does also present a more realistic view as humanWidescreen is derived from the restricted view in a cinema above the heads
of the people sitting in front of you.
Some people think it art, as the director intended etc.. but I know it's
crap.
It is a waste of space literally!
eyes' field of view is closer to widescreen than 4:3, but
the applications have to be there too.
D
darklight
well, catalyst sucks. this 24" monitor is beautiful though, i dont
understand why widescreens are becoming so popular when the high
majority of websites still cater to 800x600 or 1024x768, i just have
tons and tons of dead space to the left and right. anyways, i tried
pivot pro trial, and it worked like a charm. ati needs to improve
catalysts interface and usability significantly.
you know you can adjust the width and height using the controls on the
monitor i have a philips 170w4 17" widescreen i had the same problem
dead space either side of the desktop so i adjusted the width of the
pic using the monitor controls my resoluttio
D
darklight
well, catalyst sucks. this 24" monitor is beautiful though, i dont
understand why widescreens are becoming so popular when the high
majority of websites still cater to 800x600 or 1024x768, i just have
tons and tons of dead space to the left and right. anyways, i tried
pivot pro trial, and it worked like a charm. ati needs to improve
catalysts interface and usability significantly.
you know you can adjust the width and height using the controls on the
monitor i have a philips 170w4 17" widescreen i had the same problem
dead space either side of the desktop so i adjusted the width of the
pic using the monitor controls my resolution is 1280x768
B
Bazzer Smith
kony said:Well it does also present a more realistic view as human
eyes' field of view is closer to widescreen than 4:3, but
the applications have to be there too.
Incorrect.
The humans field of vision, measured my the anglular ratio of the
horizontal and vertical fields is 4:3. (180/135).
Thats why it was used originally, it is the human field of vision.
Widescreen should be called limited height, thats all it is.
N
Noozer
Well it does also present a more realistic view as human
This is definately wrong... My field of view is much wider than a 4:3 ratio.
Incorrect.
The humans field of vision, measured my the anglular ratio of the
horizontal and vertical fields is 4:3. (180/135).
Thats why it was used originally, it is the human field of vision.
Widescreen should be called limited height, thats all it is.
This is definately wrong... My field of view is much wider than a 4:3 ratio.
B
Bazzer Smith
Noozer said:This is definately wrong... My field of view is much wider than a 4:3
ratio.
I think you will find that my figures of 180 and 135 are pretty accute.
Also the field of visioni without shifting the eyes is esentiall 1:1 ie
round.
A million miles away from widescreen.
R
Rod Speed
Bazzer Smith said:Incorrect.
We'll see...
The humans field of vision, measured by the anglular ratio of the horizontal
and vertical fields is 4:3. (180/135).
Oh bullshit. You're ignoring the fact that we have two eyes.
Thats why it was used originally, it is the human field of vision.
Mindlessly silly, particularly with what matters in the field of view.
Widescreen should be called limited height, thats all it is.
Completely off with the ****ing fairys now.
K
kony
I think you will find that my figures of 180 and 135 are pretty accute.
Also the field of visioni without shifting the eyes is esentiall 1:1 ie
round.
A million miles away from widescreen.
Nope, far wider if you have two eyes.
B
Bazzer Smith
kony said:Nope, far wider if you have two eyes.
If they are focused on seperate points yes, I sometimes get that when I have
drunk so much my brain is unable to focus my eye on the same point.
Nice picture, but it ususally results in you throwing up!!