Why Windows 7's Success May Ruin Microsoft

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alias
  • Start date Start date
Death said:
So, you want all your software to exist on a server?

I didn't say that.
I use a cloud Word program, my dsl link resets, what the fudge just happened
to my work?
Did it automatically save it locally?
Did the server save it? (And do I want them too?)
If my connection is down for awhile, I guess I just don't work.

Ridiculous.
Most people will always want to "own" the software.

That leaves most software out the proverbial Windows. You don't own it.
You have a license to use it.
To be able to locally install,re-install it.

Perhaps cloud computing for netbooks, PDAs ... even that is weak.
People like reading email on their iPhone, but far less care for sending
email that way.
They send emails from home or the laptop.

I get emails from cell phones all the time, both business and pleasure.

Intelligent people will use both. For example, all my GMail data is on
Google's server. It's also on my internal and external hard drive.

Alias
 
Death said:
Then, you advocate partial cloud computing?
The OS is on a server, but Word is not?
You confuse me.

No, the OS will be on your computer. It just won't be as important.
Notice how I wrote "own".
You own it more than cloud computing, where it will be "monthly rent"

You "own" it at Microsoft's pleasure. Try to get some updates for
Windows 98, something you say one could "own". The new Ubuntu comes with
2 gigs of free cloud storage. Remember how Snotmail used to only give
you megabytes of storage and then GMail came along and changed all that?
I didn't say no one emails from a PDA ... most don't.
Kids and girls with little fingers like it.

Top level executives do too. I guess you don't know any.
I see, GMail is cloud computing to you.
Yes, I use hotmail too ... but its not my "real email" account.

I use GMail for personal mail. I have my own domains for my businesses.

Alias
 
Death said:
But your link is opposed to that view.

Really? Please quote the view. I couldn't find it.
You disagree with your own link.

See above.
Interesting.
Indeed.


Actually, I still have an old PC with Windows 98 on it.
It isn't online anymore, but can still be used.
I've owned Win98 for almost 12 years.
That pretty much owning it.

Reading comprehension isn't one of your strong suits? Try to get a
security update from Microsoft.
How many GB's of junkmail do you think I need to save?

It's automatically deleted every 30 days.
Even my AV gives me 10GB of free offline storage...I don't use it either.
So?


Yeah, I guess not.
Straight to the insults when you are shown to be a linux weenie.

You siad only kids and girls with little fingers like it. This implies
you know no one else who does it. Not an insult but an observation.
Impressive.
What is the domain?

You wish.

Alias
 
Alias said:

It's the fact of the inevitability.

They shouldn't be popping the champagne corks at Microsoft over the news
that Windows 7 sales are skyrocketing. A well-known management consultant
says that Windows 7's success could be the worst thing to happen to
Microsoft, and turn the company in the General Motors of software.

The market research company NPD Group reports that sales of Windows 7 in the
U.S. "were 234 percent higher than Vista's first few days of sales."

Stephen Baker, vice president of industry analysis at NPD said this about
the Windows 7 launch:
"Microsoft's program of early low-cost pre-sales, high visibility marketing,
and aggressive deals helped make the Windows 7 software launch successful.
In a slow environment for packaged software Windows 7 brought a large number
of customers into the software aisles."

Sounds like good news, doesn't it? In fact, it's just about the worst news
that Microsoft could hear, says Jay R. Galbraith, president and founder,
Galbraith Management Consultants. In an article for CNNMoney, Galbraith
argues that Microsoft could potentially become the the General Motors of
software --- old, outdated, irrelevant, and eventually headed towards ruin.
And the success of Windows 7, he says, will only accelerate that.

Galbraith says that in order for Microsoft to thrive, it needs to shift its
attention away from the desktop, and towards other devices and cloud
computing. He has this to say about why a Windows 7 success will hurt
Microsoft:

"The worst thing that could happen is a success with Windows 7, which would
reinforce management's focus on the desktop. Then, as customers move away
from the desktop to smartphones and other devices, market share will
decline. But if share declines slowly, maybe a point or two a year, the drop
will not be enough to overcome the pride that comes with high margins and
high profits. Over time, the desktop mafia will experience a shift from
pride to hubris. Welcome to the General Motors scenario.

Galbraith says that Microsoft needs to clean house and rid itself of
managers tied to past ways of thinking and doing business. And the quickest
way for that to happen, he believes, is for Microsoft's competitors to
succeed:

"The best thing that could happen to Microsoft would be successes by Apple
(AAPL) or Google (GOOG) that cause a significant loss of sales and market
share. The shock would create a sense of urgency and cause the leaders to
clean house."

He says that Microsoft does not have to turn into the next General Motors,
as long as Steve Ballmer takes drastic action:
"The General Motors scenario does not have to happen. Ballmer can focus
inward on transforming the desktop mafia to the new computing paradigm. Or,
better yet, appoint a hands-on, change-experienced chief operating officer
who can do it with him."

I don't see that happening, though. Ballmer is too wedded to the past --- a
fresh set of eyes are needed if Microsoft is going to transform itself.

Microsoft clearly isn't in trouble today --- it's got nearly a global
monopoly on operating systems, and other profit-making product lines. But GM
at one point was in a similar situation. It took decades for GM to decline.
Unless Microsoft heeds Galbraith's advice, the same eventually may happen to
Microsoft.
 
In an article for CNNMoney, Galbraith argues that Microsoft could
potentially become the the General Motors of software --- old, outdated,
irrelevant, and eventually headed towards ruin. And the success of Windows
7, he says, will only accelerate that.

If we are talking about vertical business applications, they already are and
it's not a news.

But changing platforms is not as easy as changing a car because, honestly
speaking, a platform is just a platform and it's applications where most
professionals put their focus on.

So it may take some years before rvials popping the champagne corks as well.
 
Death said:
You gotta be kidding !

" Galbraith says that in order for Microsoft to thrive, it needs to shift
its attention away from the desktop, and towards other devices and cloud
computing."

That doesn't say Microsoft -- or anyone else for that matter --
shouldn't create operating systems. It is talking about attention, not
dumping operating systems.
Every comment made by readers on that page called the blogger an idiot.
There was one Ballmer heckler.


I'm having a hard time even having a discussion with you.

With your opinions, that's not surprising.
Indeed, I question your sanity.
See above.

Who's sane? Who's normal?
What does that have to do with "owning" it.
I don't need to update it.
It works fine in the situation I use it for.

Put it on line and see how long your "ownership" lasts.
Awesome.
You get that many GBs of GMail, or do you like preaching the advantages of
useless benefits?

I don't get GBs of mail. It's not an issue.
So, free offline storage is unimportant.
Thumb drives and usb HDDs are dirt cheap.

And connecting them to an infected computer is stupid. Cloud storage can
be very convenient for computer repair and many other uses.
Once again, I question your ability to comprehend a train of thought you
began.
Perhaps your original posting had a purpose?
Heh.


What would happen?
I'm sure its on a linux server... therefore its bullet proof.
Name it.

Not gonna happen.

Alias
 
Death wrote:

Snip childish drivel and oneupsmanship.
I hear ya.
Linux security is way over-rated.

You're very ill informed and have no imagination. On my business web
sites, you will find my address, phone, fax and email. It doesn't take a
genius to figure out what could be done with that information.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:

You're very ill informed just like I am and have no imagination. On my
bogus business web sites, you will find my bogus address, phone, fax and
email. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what could be done with
that bogus information.

Alias
 
Alias said:



This is a bit like saying someone becoming wealthier will cause them to
become poorer; an argument which doesn't bear a lot of weight. Also MS have
had a proverbial finger in the computing cloud 'pie' for a while.

Not listening to their real grassroot customers in favour of pursuing an
customer-antagonistic, 'allopathic' agenda, is more likely to be the
ultimate cause of the their downfall; The non-provision of a Windows 7
newsgroup, despite the uproar from this group, being a classic example of
this.
 
Alias wrote:

You're very ill informed just like I am and have no imagination. On my
bogus business web sites, you will find my bogus address, phone, fax and
email. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what could be done with that
bogus information.

Alias

All you need to know is, that between my businesses, I'd probably earn more
in one day than you do in a year. :-)

Alias
 
Alias said:
All you need to know is, that between my businesses, I'd probably earn
more in one day than you do in a year. :-)

Alias

Sorry, Monopoly money doesn't count! So you are that rich, you need to run
Open Source software and fix PC's for others, charging them money? HA HA HA
HA HA

Loser.

Remember, if it doesn't sound logical, then it is most likely a lie.

Oh yea, your lips are moving. It is a lie.
 
Kevin said:
Sorry, Monopoly money doesn't count! So you are that rich, you need to
run Open Source software and fix PC's for others, charging them money?
HA HA HA HA HA

Loser.

Remember, if it doesn't sound logical, then it is most likely a lie.

Oh yea, your lips are moving. It is a lie.

You're replying to the impostor, idiot.

Alias
 
Alias said:
You're replying to the impostor, idiot.

Alias

It doesn't matter which RETARD is posting. I will reply to you or the
imposter depending on content. You really are STUPID.
 
STAN STARINSKI said:
So you admit Ubuntu is a business for you?

Any person with IQ level above 60 can figure out what kind of business is
yours. -

You dream of an IQ above 60. Too bad. If only you knew how to change the
time on your PC. I suggest calling tech support and they can walk an idiot
like yourself through the steps to fix your clock. I know you're afraid,
but try it.

Just FYI.



<SNIP RAMBLING BULLSHIT>
 
Kevin said:
It doesn't matter which RETARD is posting. I will reply to you or the
imposter depending on content. You really are STUPID.

Yeah, and you always say the same untrue things. You really are BORING.

Alias
 
STAN said:
So you admit Ubuntu is a business for you?

Any person with IQ level above 60 can figure out what kind of business
is yours. -
TechSupport for Ubuntu.

It's not COmmunity that you care about, but 2 other things:

a) Hurt "large greedy Corporations, like Microsoft" which
("corporations') ironically are the reason for progress, many jobs
including in your Mari*uana-smoking country of Spain, and comfortable
life in the West, and now spreading to the East and formerly communist
countries.
They corporations made it possible for you to sit in a comfy chair and
Troll endless about how corporatiosn are "bad".
So you think jobs are created by big government signing some papers
ordering peoples "let's get busy?"
No my friend. It is companies like Microsoft who employ lots of your
gellow Spaniards, who provide overall direction while countless small
busiensses create bulk of the jobs, large corporations are as necessary
as large fish is necessary in the ocean.

b) You're part of Mike Shuttleworth's business providing paid long-term
support of a Hobbyist OS known as LeeNux - Ubuntu flavor. Several years
later it';; be another distro, I persoanlly prefer NovellSUSE.

Fact remains is you're a liar. You mak emoney off it.
Therefore you Trol so you make more money.

I am not the only "genius" here, lost of other peopel relaized why you
Troll.

Again I admit you're a smart man.
Guess what?

I AM SMARTER.

Really? Considering everything you just posted is untrue, you're not
very smart after all.

Alias
 
Alias said:
Yeah, and you always say the same untrue things. You really are BORING.

Alias

You must like the posts because you reply to each and every one of them. I
am doing my Noble Mission by correcting the lies you post on a daily basis
about that SHITTY Ubuntu that nobody wants or needs.

Remember that Ubuntu is FREE and most reject Ubuntu as a TOY OS. Good for
nothing. Worth nothing.


Live with it.
 
Back
Top