G
GreenXenon
Moe Trin wrote:
When I did electronics at university SRAM was much faster than DRAM and
you didn't need the refresh cycles. Have things changed? They are larger
(physically) and more expensive because each cell uses multiple transistors.
Indeed wikipedia hashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_random_access_memory
Characteristics
SRAM is more expensive, but faster and significantly less power hungry
(especially idle) than DRAM. It is therefore used where either bandwidth
or low power, or both, are principal considerations. SRAM is also easier
to control (interface to) and generally more truly random access than
modern types of DRAM. Due to a more complex internal structure, SRAM is
less dense than DRAM and is therefore not used for high-capacity,
low-cost applications such as the main memory in personal computers.
Data remanence is a problem that affects SRAM more significantly and
longer than DRAM.
Capacitor-free DRAM is the best for preserving your privacy.