Nick said:
I see you are a genuine idiot.
Thank you very much; I appreciate the compliment. said:
Did it not occur to you that I may only use OE for reading News?
You keep asking if I'd "forgotten", or if something didn't "occur" to
me. Of course, it "occurred" to me. But tell me honestly: how many
people do you know who use OE for news and use something else for
email? I can't think of anyone - except now you. But you *are* a
special case, aren't you?
And, OE can be made as safe as any other MUA _IF_ you know what you
That's a big IF, as you typed.
are doing -- my comment about using a "genuinely safe Email
client" was aimed at those who cannot/will not do anything short of
"install and use" (i.e. not do any custom configuration beyond
entering the necessary Email service options to collect their
mail).
If everyone on the planet knew how to safely configure their computers
and software, this newsgroup would not exist and we would not be
having this conversation.
You are clearly inadequately intellected to partake in meaningful
discussions of these issues...
Perhaps it is your method of terms usage that is not up to par.
"Network traffic" can be anywhere.
I mean at the network traffic level _on the client_.
Oh. If only you had said that first - those three extra words - I
would not have been inadequately intellected to ask.
In simple terms, a proper client-side Email traffic scanner hooks
into the network stack at a very low level and monitors the traffic
for various tell-tale signs (TCP traffic to port 25 being a good
one for SMTP sending).
See? "proper client-side Email traffic scanner" would have removed the
ambiguity of your previous post.
I appreciate your use of "simple terms" - not for me as I am not
intellectually challenged - but for hundreds of others who may have
less of an understanding of the matters being discussed, and are
reading along.
You started by harping on the minor ambiguity of my post about not
reading mail in HTML, and then proceed to toss all sorts of
ambiguities around yourself. <sigh>