Where else can I get Rapid-Q?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John R. Sellers
  • Start date Start date
John R. Sellers said:
Whoa. I thought Rapid-Q was a programming language. I'm lookin' for a
freeware visual programming language.
Click to expand...
Babya bDevelop is a free application development system is now available to
download. It also includes a Visual Basic to bDevelop code converter and is
similar to Rapid Q-but works on 2000/XP as well as 9.x.

Downloads:
http://tinyurl.com/2ofgj -Babya bDevelop
Author:Babya Software Group
http://babyasystem.portal.dk3.com/

Any reviews are welcome
 
Just out of curiosity...how many friggin popups do you have connected to
your website??? Is your software full of popups too? Adware? Spyware? If
you ever get a clean site let me know and I'll "pop" in again.
 
Ceg said:
Just out of curiosity...how many friggin popups do you have connected to
your website??? Is your software full of popups too? Adware? Spyware? If
you ever get a clean site let me know and I'll "pop" in again.
Click to expand...

No, none of my software contains spyware
 
A.A. Fussy said:
connected

Actually, bDevelop lets you create your own programs.
Click to expand...

Could some download bDevelop and try it out then post a review of it? How
would it compare to RapidQ?
 
Babya bDevelop is a free application development system is now available to
download. It also includes a Visual Basic to bDevelop code converter and is
similar to Rapid Q-but works on 2000/XP as well as 9.x.

Downloads:
http://tinyurl.com/2ofgj -Babya bDevelop
Click to expand...

As soon as I started it, I got"Toolbar error..."
 
Ceg said:
I was interested in that particular program...do you have a clean info page
link?
Click to expand...
Yes, here's the download link:
http://tinyurl.com/2ofgj
and at Fileforum
ttp://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1076499876 - on that page ,
submit a review:


John R. Sellers, your system might not have the mscomctl.ocx file. Download
it from:
 
A.A. Fussy said:
Yes, here's the download link:
http://tinyurl.com/2ofgj
and at Fileforum
ttp://fileforum.betanews.com/detail.php3?fid=1076499876 - on that page ,
submit a review:


John R. Sellers, your system might not have the mscomctl.ocx file. Download
it from:
Click to expand...

I have to applaud your enthusiasm and your efforts. However, I feel it
would be in your interest that a review not be filed at this time. In the
way of constructive criticism, you might want to download O'Basic and it's
Freedom Patch and take a look at that system. Good luck on your endeavors.
 
Some object to top posting. If this thread isn't a good example of why to
top post then you're a glutton for punishment.

Glenn
 
Glenn scribebat:
Some object to top posting. If this thread isn't a good example of why to
top post then you're a glutton for punishment.
Click to expand...

No - it is a good example of why one should snip unnecessary parts of a
posting.

bye,

Onno
 
I prefer top posting. I don't have to read through 5,000 lines of crap to
read someone's one-line reply. It's also a force-of-habit carry-over from
the military...newer reports always went at the beginning.
 
I prefer top posting. I don't have to read through 5,000 lines of
crap to read someone's one-line reply.
Click to expand...

Top posting is only marginally worse than bottom posting if you don't
quote properly. Do what I've just done by removing superfluous text
and it'll make perfect sense.

Anyway, this is just of rehash of the countless pages found on
the web detailing why top posting is an infinitely bad idea.
It's also a force-of-habit
carry-over from the military...newer reports always went at the
beginning.
Click to expand...

Sounds odd. Are you really sure that these two situations are
comparable?
 
Back
Top