A GF4 is a bigger step above a GF3, but overall, 3~4 are the same
family.
??? The GeForce 5 has been shipping since last Spring. They're called
5200 / 5600 / 5700 / 5800 / 5900. The GeForce 4 was called "4mx /
4Ti" - but only the "4Ti" were true GF4 cards.
A GF3 croaks on 2003 games (Unreal2 etc)
Don't know what other Brits think about the accents. To me though Spike's
and Dru' are a but much, and that of one of those potential slayers in the
last series, now showing here, is beyond the pale.
Actually BBC 2 show it after a certain delay.
Don't know what other Brits think about the accents. To me though Spike's
and Dru' are a but much, and that of one of those potential slayers in the
last series, now showing here, is beyond the pale.
I *think* it was supposed to be aCockney (London) accent, as done byThat potential Slayer you mentioned - what the hell kind of accent was that
supposed to be anyway? I thought it was an Austrailian one.
Mark Morrison said:I *think* it was supposed to be aCockney (London) accent, as done by
someone whose only exposure to the accent was watching Mary Poppins as
a child.
No, the GeForce 5 had a brand name - Power FX ? GeForce Power ?
Sothing like that. I'm not talking about the generation of cards,
just what they were called.
That's the one ! GeForce FX.They renamed the fifth generation to GeForce FX and then the
individual models were numbered from 5200 up. The 5200 is basically
the MX version of the card and the 5900 is the top of the range card.
That's the one ! GeForce FX.
Anyway, my next card will probably be a 256mb FX, at least, but that's
some way off.
Half-Life 2, perhaps, depending upon how it runs on my system.
Problem is, I'll probably have to get a new CPU and motherboard at the
same time, as my 2000 Athlon would really push a FX to full capacity.
No, the GeForce 5 had a brand name - Power FX ? GeForce Power ?
Sothing like that. I'm not talking about the generation of cards,
just what they were called.
I have a GF 3 atm, so going to a GF 5 will be a big enough leap, IFrom what I have read you may be better off with an ATI card. The
FX's aren't such a great leap over the GF4's, at least up to the
5800's. Shop around first, I know that ATI have fixed the driver
support problems they used to have and I know a couple of nVidia fans
who have switched to Radeon's.
Errr.... With all these posts you can't figure out that they're called
"FX" and that they are are "GeForce 5", thats why they are 5x00 in
their model names.
They added the FX tag - Whoopie.
My handle is Darthy.... if I put FX-Darthy, I'd still be the same
poster. (unless someone pretends to be me).
I have a GF 3 atm, so going to a GF 5 will be a big enough leap, I
think.
Not a lot - Halo isn't a game with particularly impressive graphics to
begin with, not least because it was designed to run on a GF4MX core
machine (XBox).
What? The Xbox's GPU is a mix between a Geforce3 and Geforce4 - some
features not even in the Geforce4. It is certainly nowhere near a GF4MX.
the hype will continue...yes there is eye candy....but itJAD said:NOTHING BUT HYPE....and when the DX9 hype is over DX10 will be out and
skills, easier recognition of your enemy, longer burnoutshas LITTLE, to do with performance or FPS or better aim, better driving
John Hall said:I
know, cause I have an ATI 9800 pro and Call of Duty looks great and runs
like butter. Gaming skills, well, that's another issue.