Clive said:
I use hard disks as backups. I copy my data direct using Save 'n' sync to a
'backup' hard disk in another machine that runs 24/7. Inside this backup
machine I also have two disks that again copy my data - so I end up with
three copies of my 'data'.
What's Save 'n' sync? An imaging product like Acronis or something?
I try to keep multiple copies, too. It can be difficult to manage,
but it's cheap and simple if you have several PCs/disk drives.
I figure it's easy enough to install the operating system onto a new disk
and then just copy my data back.
To an extent, yes, except for the registry issues I've mentioned.
UNIX has no registry, but it can still have problems sometimes.
FreeBSD seems to be very good at recognizing hardware as it boots, so
I don't actually have to change much to get it to run on new hardware
(but if I customize the kernel I have to make sure there's enough left
in it to boot on new hardware, i.e., no missing drivers). It's easier
to recover on UNIX than on Windows.
I don't like 'backup' software that creates a backup file(s). Much rather
have the data in it's native format - that way I can copy it, share it, etc,
without the need for backup software.
It's easier to get it disorganized that way, though.
Acronis lets me "mount" a backup file as a virtual read-only drive and
examine it exactly as if all the structure were restored to a disk
drive. Then I can copy individual files, etc., as required. Works
really well from what I've seen in my tests, so I have the best of
both worlds (one giant backup file, but still the possibility of
restoring individual files).