J
Jesper Monsted
True, I didn't snip all of Rod^Hn's jibber. Maybe I should have. 8)
Or just snip Ron entirely - let the jihad guys in Iraq have him.
True, I didn't snip all of Rod^Hn's jibber. Maybe I should have. 8)
Jesper Monsted said:Or just snip Ron entirely - let the jihad guys in Iraq have him.
Ron Reaugh said:Has anyone ever heard anyone claim that the length of a HD's warranty was
simply a marketing and price point decision by the mfg and the warranty
length has nothing to do with expected drive life?
He'd fit right in with those wackos. Pretty soon we'd have terrorist
attacks on SCSI controller makers, not to mention the heretics at
storagereview.com... 8)
Impmon said:A frying pan would help as those high speed drives can get really hot.
Nothing like fresh eggs and bacon while reading emails in the morning.
Do make sure your PC case have excellent cooling system before
considering 10K+ drives.
experience
Johan Kullstam said:It cannot be *totally* unrelated. A manufacturer doesn't want a whole
lot of returns. You can expect that *most* drives will *at least*
make it through the warranty period.
A hard drive is free to continue operation well past the warranty
expiration time. As far as I can tell, the 3 to 1 year standard ATA
warrenty shorting has had no impact on actual drive lifetimes.
Ron Reaugh said:So in a pen
stroke a company could change its HD warranty length and even retroactively
without great exposure SINCE the drives were ALREADY going to last for 5
years anyway as I've always said.
Mike said:Yes, just as you "always said" there was nothing wrong with the Deskstar
75GXPs. We know better now, don't we?
J. Clarke said:What's this "we", White Man?
You have a mouse in your pocket?
Mike said:It's the royal 'we', old chap.
It's neither a mouse nor a gun. It means I'm pleased to see you.
Yes, just as you "always said" there was nothing wrong with the
Deskstar 75GXPs. We know better now, don't we?
Oooh, those were almost as nice as the 36LZX 18gig ultrastars. I had 50
servers delivered, each with one of those drives. I had about 60 exchanges
on them before my vendor started giving me seagates
Has anyone ever heard anyone claim that the length of a HD's warranty was
simply a marketing and price point decision by the mfg and the warranty
length has nothing to do with expected drive life? Somewhere I think I
remember someone making such a claim and a bunch of trolls tried
unsuccessfully to shoot him down?
Nonsense. It's the opposite for the first three years: over 1% in first year,
under 1% in next two.
Michael Giegerich said:Believe me, the rate goes up ... (until no drive will
work anymore, i.e. 100 % failures; just wait - may
take a few years, but it will go there
the y-axis is failure rate
Michael said:Eric Gisin:
Assuming you're right, after how many years the failure
rate would have come down to 0 % then?
Believe me, the rate goes up ... (until no drive will
work anymore, i.e. 100 % failures; just wait - may
take a few years, but it will go there
J. Clarke said:Common phenomenon with electronics of any kind--a high rate of "infant
mortality" in the first few months of operation, then a relatively low
failure rate until pieces start dying of old age.