How hypocritical! An unprovoked attach on Ralf while accusing him of
being the one provoking flame wars and at the same time trying to claim
that you are above such things.
Since Don is ignoring you I'll let Ralf himself respond (s. below) ;o)
=>Do note (!) that none of those provocations were replied to by Don!
So in utter frustration of being ignored - and after months of
stalking Don *unsuccessfully* trying to provoke him - Ralf posted this
ironic gem blissfully ignorant of the self-referencing contradiction:
....
"Everybody who still acknowledges him or engages in any kind of
exchange with this wanker becomes himself a part of the problem."
....
Said Ralf, responding to Don and desperately trying to engage him. %-/
Many more where that came from, left as an exercise for the reader.
Don.
--- arbitrary start ---
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:27:12 +0100
....
Do yourself and all of us a favour. Join your local therapy group of
Praters Anonymous before it's too late.
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:44:51 +0100
....
Do note that this info came from our resident Vuescan basher.
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 10:17:05 +0200
....
Now, as the troll calling himself Don has stated repeatedly
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 17:39:24 +0200
....
All that in one single message. Can you spell paranoia? Obsession?
Crusade?
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 17:39:24 +0200
....
Which goes a long way to demonstrate just how much practical relevance
the nonsense uttered by our resident troll has.
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 23:03:04 +0200
....
Sh*t happens. You're the best example for this theory.
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:05:49 +0200
....
You should have followed this bugger long enough to know that he's a
troll
--- (and after all that this precious gem of ironic contradiction) ---
From: Ralf R. Radermacher
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 18:25:57 +0100
....
It takes two to tango. Don is a troll.
....
Everybody who still acknowledges him or engages in any kind of
exchange with this wanker becomes himself a part of the problem.
--- end? ---