Vista won't allow installation of unsigned drivers!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ToolPackinMama
  • Start date Start date
Jeff said:
It's "hear!" ...and by the way "you're correct," but "your car" ...drives me
crazy fishing through the grammar.

heheheh its typing not grammer. I hate typing, and its even harder to do with 8 fingers instead of
10. sometimes letters go untyped. But thanks for that. Lol
 
FWIW, "unsigned" drivers does not equal shitty drivers.

If I removed all my unsigned drivers right now, my 'puter would cease to
function.

Can't have that.
 
ToolPackinMama said:
FWIW, "unsigned" drivers does not equal shitty drivers.

If I removed all my unsigned drivers right now, my 'puter would cease to
function.

Can't have that.


no it wouldn't,,and quit buying crappy hardware
 
JAD said:
no it wouldn't,,and quit buying crappy hardware

LOL, I take it that every scrap of software you use has the MS blessing?

You never once clicked "install anyway"? I'm skeptical. :)
 
ToolPackinMama said:
LOL, I take it that every scrap of software you use has the MS blessing?

You never once clicked "install anyway"? I'm skeptical. :)

I have on occasion, but taking note of any *cough* OS *cough* problems, I
put the blame where it belongs and dump the hardware.
 
John Doe said:
The troll is admittedly frustrated with his own crappy hardware and
keeps taking it out on everyone else.

What makes you think that anyone here may be interested in reading someone
else's headers? Or that we are incapably of going and finding them for
ourselves if needed:
Subject: Re: Vista won't allow installation of unsigned drivers!
From: John Doe <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 44
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.8.83.4
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.net 1166765812 ST000 75.8.83.4 (Fri, 22 Dec
2006 00:36:52 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:36:52 EST
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1:
FKPGGX[DRJTURID[FJKD^RLARJT@QDDMEPWXODMMHXMTWA]EPMS[AACY@TZZXQ[KS^ESKCJLOF_J_NGAWNTG^_XGTNTAHULK[X[NRTC@G\P^PLT_OCBRHUO@@TBQZDZMHD[YZ@NLXQXIWMOSXT_KOLK^^CXFF\WHMI^C@EGA_[FXAQ@E^TGNMUXGYNS[QQVL
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:36:52 GMT
Xref: text.news.blueyonder.co.uk alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:71368
 
What makes you think that anyone here may be interested in reading
someone else's headers? Or that we are incapably of going and
finding them for ourselves if needed:

I couldn't care less whether your netcop wanna-be troll self is
interested in reading someone else's header. If the site of header
information scares you, don't read my posts. You might be too naïve
to know, but I'm not the only author on USENET who posts header
information.









See also:
"Steve" <steveh nf.sympatico.ca>
"Steve" <steveh NOSPAMhunkys.fslife.co.uk>
"SteveH" <steve.hough REMOVEMEblueyonder.co.uk>
"steveh" <steveh private.co.uk>
steve.hay uk.radan.com (Steve Hay)
Steve <postmaster 127.0.0.1>
Steve Hennessey <steve hennessey.net>
steve italiancar.co.uk (SteveH)
 
January 2007 PC WORLD - buried in Scott Spanbauer's "VISTA: the upgrade"
article is this astonishing statement:

"... Vista won't let you install unsigned drivers that haven't been
through Microsoft's quality assurance process..."

I'm horrified. How do you feel?

It's just Bill's way of telling you to use Linux.

He's into charity now.
 
Back
Top