D
Dale
But you don't have to read the up button or decipher where you're going.
You're just going up once. With Vista's overall attempt to isolate the user
from the storage, then the up button supports the concept of the parent
folder. The bread crumbs assume that what I am seeing now is always in the
same hierarchy with the same names and that I care about, or even know those
names. All I want to do is go up one.
And the up button is always in exactly the same place on the window,
regardless of the name of the folders being displayed. And it's easily
identifiable. To determine the second folder from the right, especially in
LTR languages, I have to parse the entire string or at least the latter part
of it, and to decode the arrows and buttons that those names can become.
I'm not saying those are bad things. Once you get used to them, and
especially the sub menus allowing you to easily go sideways in the
hierarchy, the interface has great uses. I still miss the Up button.
It
would be a great finish to a great new Explorer.
Dale
You're just going up once. With Vista's overall attempt to isolate the user
from the storage, then the up button supports the concept of the parent
folder. The bread crumbs assume that what I am seeing now is always in the
same hierarchy with the same names and that I care about, or even know those
names. All I want to do is go up one.

And the up button is always in exactly the same place on the window,
regardless of the name of the folders being displayed. And it's easily
identifiable. To determine the second folder from the right, especially in
LTR languages, I have to parse the entire string or at least the latter part
of it, and to decode the arrows and buttons that those names can become.
I'm not saying those are bad things. Once you get used to them, and
especially the sub menus allowing you to easily go sideways in the
hierarchy, the interface has great uses. I still miss the Up button.

would be a great finish to a great new Explorer.
Dale