F
Frank Parmelee
I thought by now there would be a ton of horror stories on Vista SP2. It
looks like everyone had success.
looks like everyone had success.
Frank Parmelee said:I thought by now there would be a ton of horror stories on Vista SP2. It
looks like everyone had success.
--
Frank said:I thought by now there would be a ton of horror stories on Vista SP2. It
looks like everyone had success.
Frank Parmelee said:I thought by now there would be a ton of horror stories on Vista SP2. It
looks like everyone had success.
I did it last night.Frank said:I thought by now there would be a ton of horror stories on Vista SP2. It
looks like everyone had success.
Alex Clayton said:How can you tell if you have it?
You get the same thing if you do Start-Computer-Help-About Windows.Alex Clayton said:Thanks but can someone say this in non geek, since I have not a clue what
this was telling me? <G>
Vlad-the-Impaler said:It has failed to install 4 times here.
Twice using Windows Update with AV off.
Once after installing KB947821 and using the standalone KB948465.
Once more with the AV completely removed.
Once more...and I wipe Vista off the HD.
Jeez...even linux actually installs the updates it offers.
johnm said:maybe no one installed it...
maybe everyone who did found their machines wouldn't boot this morning...
lotsa maybes
Vlad-the-Impaler said:Well, at least I discovered available options long ago.
I'm sure even if I got it installed, sp2 would end up as a downgrade.
Vista will be the last MS purchase I make.
I have no interest whatsoever in their software.
What's hilarious is the update fails with 80004005 - UNKNOWN error.
If the OS doesn't know what is failing, who does?
Alias said:I find that with Windows, service packs are best installed after a clean
install of Windows.
Alias
measekite said:And most people find that Ubuntu is a piece of CRAP that NOBODY wants so
they should stick with Windows.
Alias said:False. But, then again, you're not famous for posting anything but lies.
Alias
measekite said:It's true. Tell me why after all these years with Ubuntu being FREE, why
Ubuntu is still on less than one percent of the desktops?
I'll tell you
why, the product is SHIT and when people try Ubuntu, they quickly realize
how ****ed up it is and wipe it from their machines.
measekite said:So you haven't heard of "WORD OF MOUTH"? If a product is FREE and it's
good, word of mouth would spread across the planet in days or weeks.
Everyone would be installing this fantastic product and MS would drift out
to sea and sink. Guess what? That didn't happen. Ubuntu has been FREE for
years, yet it still has less than one percent of the desktops out there.
That should tell you that word of mouth isn't working on that product. Why?
Because it's SHIT.
People download Ubuntu, install it, figure out it's worth exactly what they
pay for it: NOTHING. Then they delete Ubuntu and go back to Windows.
Now that is the truth.
Live with it.
Alias said:All lies. Ho hum. I have even asked the folks who help people buy
computers at Spain's largest department store and they hadn't heard of it.
Most people have not heard of it and I know dozens who, once they had
Ubuntu installed on their machines, asked themselves why they ever used
Windows.
Alias
measekite said:Remember what I said about Word of Mouth? For a good product it will spread
'round the world. For a crappy product, people will keep quite. You
already know the truth about Ubuntu but are afraid to admit it. Oh well.