vista releiability

  • Thread starter Thread starter flybywire
  • Start date Start date
F

flybywire

When i first got my laptop with vista my rating was 9.17 now i only average
around 4.15

Anybody got any comparison indices

am using asus x51rl , 1024 mem 120gb hd duo t2330 cpu

cheers

Mike
 
flybywire said:
When i first got my laptop with vista my rating was 9.17 now i only
average around 4.15

Anybody got any comparison indices

am using asus x51rl , 1024 mem 120gb hd duo t2330 cpu

cheers

Mike


9.17 ?
Never.
Unless you edit it.
I typed in 20...computer got no faster.
 
Mick Murphy said:
That sums up your lack of intelligence!
We don't want to know your I.Q.


LOL.
An insult.
From a moron.
My answer still is right.
You can edit it....many people have a 10.
But the results of any test improve performance by a factor of zilch.
I am far above you...IQ -wise.

Far far far
 
my system stability chart shows it at 9.7 at start beginning this year and
5.15 today

shall run the other reports

glad to see you are a bunch with a sense of humour
 
flybywire said:
my system stability chart shows it at 9.7 at start beginning this year and
5.15 today

shall run the other reports

glad to see you are a bunch with a sense of humour


Sorry.
We misinterpreted what you were saying.
The reliability monitor would be a 10.
Mine is 9.43.
Any software you install, any issues could drive that number down.
The chart will give you great insight.

That Mick Murphy wouldn't know his ask from a hole in the ground.
 
I guess rather than saying, "How broke is YOUR Vista?" you might spend some
time looking through the report and finding out why your copy of Vista is so
unstable. Mine is at 10.0 and has been for several days now. The last time
mine crashed I looked at the report, saw that the ATI Catalyst Control
Center was crashing even while I slept, so I removed my ATI card and
replaced it with an nVidia. Since then it's all been uphill. :-)
 
They let you out of the Nuthouse for weekends, do they?
Remember, be back at 8.00am sharp, Monday morning, loser.
 
Mick Murphy said:
You LIVE in a hole in the ground, lol.
Crawl back under your rock.


Fudging top-posting idget.
How hard is it to post in the way people write...progressive time increments
?
You friggen answer the q before it was asked.
Usenet should ban all such dipsheets !
as, all top posters are dipsheets.
Fudging non-communicative basturds
 
Sorry about that; thought you were talking about the Experience Index, System
Rating..
All you said was "Rating"

My reliability is 9.49
 
Mick Murphy said:
Sorry about that; thought you were talking about the Experience Index,
System
Rating..
All you said was "Rating"

My reliability is 9.49


LOL.
You dimwhit.
That was ascertained some time ago.
Jebus !
 
Hey LOSER!
I have manners; unlike you.
I am PERSONALLY explaining to the OP re: the incorrect info was given.

When you say "dimwhit"; STOP looking in the mirror, lol.
And learn to SPELL (dimwit); mr/mrs. highiq.
You don't get capitals in your name, lowlife.
 
Mick Murphy said:
Hey LOSER!
I have manners; unlike you.
I am PERSONALLY explaining to the OP re: the incorrect info was given.

When you say "dimwhit"; STOP looking in the mirror, lol.
And learn to SPELL (dimwit); mr/mrs. highiq.
You don't get capitals in your name, lowlife.


Owned.
Like that cabalash frigger
 
"as, all top posters are dipsheets.
Fudging non-communicative basturds"

Rick Rogers MVP, and a lot of other MVPs top post!
So, they are "dipsheets" and "basturds" too, are they?

You just wore your welcome out here, "mr. low.iq"
 
Mick Murphy said:
"as, all top posters are dipsheets.
Fudging non-communicative basturds"

Rick Rogers MVP, and a lot of other MVPs top post!
So, they are "dipsheets" and "basturds" too, are they?

You just wore your welcome out here, "mr. low.iq"


I just kicked your ask.
No MVP is dumb enough to screw with me.
I will eat them alive.
I outsmart all the douches in here.
ALL OF THEM.
 
Back
Top