M
MICHAEL
I'll hand in my report by Sunday night. I will
also be trying the upgrade install on another box.
However, my scenario will be different and may
serve as a contrast and compare.
My other machine has WinXP Pro SP2, newish
computer. Bare bones, nothing extra on it- not even
an AV. It does have Sygate Pro firewall, which is
now owned by Symantec. :-(
I haven't even put Office on it. I had been testing a
friend's theory that you don't need all sorts of security
software to have a secure uninfected computer. I've
seen others say the same. I run it in Limited User, I have
IE locked down tight, OE is locked down, and just practice
safe hex- which means, use dang common sense about what
you open, what you download and from where. I did put
Sygate on it. But, outbound protection isn't needed if you
don't ever get infected. Unless, you want to block things like
WGA from calling the mothership. A router and Windows firewall
is sufficient. And really, a NAT router with SPI is great protection,
you don't need another firewall on the OS. I hear users talk
about running two AVs in real-time, some two firewalls- Windows
and some third-party firewall, different spyware programs and
blah, blah, blah.
But other than Sygate, I haven't installed any extra software.
It is amazing how well XP runs when it isn't loaded down with
a bunch of crap. Many users probably don't even notice- over
time they have installed and uninstalled so much software they
don't realize how bogged down XP has become. I think those are
the users who swear Vista is "faster". Well, it just might be for
them, because it is a clean install with no extra crap and hardly
anything running in the systray.
I will let you guys know how it goes. I'm betting, my upgrade
install will go much smoother than Mark's.
-Michael
also be trying the upgrade install on another box.
However, my scenario will be different and may
serve as a contrast and compare.
My other machine has WinXP Pro SP2, newish
computer. Bare bones, nothing extra on it- not even
an AV. It does have Sygate Pro firewall, which is
now owned by Symantec. :-(
I haven't even put Office on it. I had been testing a
friend's theory that you don't need all sorts of security
software to have a secure uninfected computer. I've
seen others say the same. I run it in Limited User, I have
IE locked down tight, OE is locked down, and just practice
safe hex- which means, use dang common sense about what
you open, what you download and from where. I did put
Sygate on it. But, outbound protection isn't needed if you
don't ever get infected. Unless, you want to block things like
WGA from calling the mothership. A router and Windows firewall
is sufficient. And really, a NAT router with SPI is great protection,
you don't need another firewall on the OS. I hear users talk
about running two AVs in real-time, some two firewalls- Windows
and some third-party firewall, different spyware programs and
blah, blah, blah.
But other than Sygate, I haven't installed any extra software.
It is amazing how well XP runs when it isn't loaded down with
a bunch of crap. Many users probably don't even notice- over
time they have installed and uninstalled so much software they
don't realize how bogged down XP has become. I think those are
the users who swear Vista is "faster". Well, it just might be for
them, because it is a clean install with no extra crap and hardly
anything running in the systray.
I will let you guys know how it goes. I'm betting, my upgrade
install will go much smoother than Mark's.
-Michael