In some groups, I used to have my agent.ini set with NNTP-posting-host
in the NewsBaseFields=, since that had more immediate meaning than the
constantly morphing From: fields. Of course, yep, reading headers doesn't
take care of the more sophisticated morphers.
I'm fairly okay at recognizing "voice," and I've been able to ID individuals
successfully on that basis, outside of headers, on occasion. Yet when
they're deliberately maintaining special characters, and they've a little
talent, then that poses an extra challenge.
If they're furthermore strategic about their timing and similar (namely,
being careful of the common give-away of having sock puppets who only roll
for the function of supporting one particular poster whenever they get backed
into a corner during a flamewar), then their chance of getting caught out
is really tiny.
The aforementioned Entity, it took an entire mailing list, as a thinktank,
and a couple of years collective effort, to be able to half-validly piece
together the workings behind its puppet shows. It was justifiably one vewwwy
proud Troll. (The Entity used to regularly piss me off. The yob of a good
troll. Now these years later, I have to concede credit to its talents where
due.)
One of my heroes, for being the greatest of the Usenet Performance Artists,
and equally the most devoted and dedicated to the craft, that would be Raoul
Xemblinosky III. You know, I'd sort of assumed he retired. Assumption because
of not being near his playgrounds in such a long time.
It was back in the 90's when I used to follow some of the plays in nanau &
nosers and the others. My netnews reading has not roamed much at all over
these past 4-5 years. On occasional bouts for reminiscing, it included visits
to Xemblinsosky's homepage <
http://member.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq/> -- and that
appeared to be basically an historical document.
Then tonight, on thinking about it, I checked groups.google.com. And wow,
he does seem to be still active. Naturally the first interpretation of
seeing recent hits, it would be that it was nothing other than evidence
that others had adopted his famous nym (as per tradition). Reading a few
of the posts, however, I do imagine that I am accurately recognizing his
voice. That it's not this time one of the headers morph things....
Ok, Jo, it might be a daft amount of work, but that sure doesn't stop the
Usenet feature of some amazingly indefatigable characters, who demonstrate
the most formidable commitment to the pursuit of the silly....