R
Richard Urban
I have to wonder just how many people are finding out, much to their dismay,
that the operating system on their computer is not legal. They can turn in
the jerk who put it on his/her system and charged him/her for it - as if it
were a legal copy.
As far as easily removing WGA, now that would negate the whole point of
Microsoft doing what they are doing, wouldn't it?
An extremely rich man has the option of putting lo-jack in his Ferrari. He
doesn't have to allow anyone to steal it, just because he can easily afford
to purchase a replacement, or two.
Regardless of what anyone says, my feeling is that Microsoft has the right
to use WGA to ferret out the illegal copies. The user, when caught, has
options.
1. He can say to himself: I got away with it for five years. I guess I
will have to finally buy a copy of Windows XP.
2. He can - yes, really he can - start using an alternative if he is too
cheap to purchase a replacement for that which he has stolen.
3. He can try to find a way around WGA. But I would expect Microsoft to
counter at any time. If I were them, I would.
I have in my software closet multiple copies of every operating system
Microsoft released since DOS 6.0., as well as three different versions of
OS/2. I paid for each one of them. Added up, it would be in the thousands.
Do I hold it against Microsoft and IBM that I had to pay for what I wanted?
I'll let you guess on that, but I will gladly pay for Windows Vista when it
is released, because I "WANT" it.
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
that the operating system on their computer is not legal. They can turn in
the jerk who put it on his/her system and charged him/her for it - as if it
were a legal copy.
As far as easily removing WGA, now that would negate the whole point of
Microsoft doing what they are doing, wouldn't it?
An extremely rich man has the option of putting lo-jack in his Ferrari. He
doesn't have to allow anyone to steal it, just because he can easily afford
to purchase a replacement, or two.
Regardless of what anyone says, my feeling is that Microsoft has the right
to use WGA to ferret out the illegal copies. The user, when caught, has
options.
1. He can say to himself: I got away with it for five years. I guess I
will have to finally buy a copy of Windows XP.
2. He can - yes, really he can - start using an alternative if he is too
cheap to purchase a replacement for that which he has stolen.
3. He can try to find a way around WGA. But I would expect Microsoft to
counter at any time. If I were them, I would.
I have in my software closet multiple copies of every operating system
Microsoft released since DOS 6.0., as well as three different versions of
OS/2. I paid for each one of them. Added up, it would be in the thousands.
Do I hold it against Microsoft and IBM that I had to pay for what I wanted?
I'll let you guess on that, but I will gladly pay for Windows Vista when it
is released, because I "WANT" it.
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User
Quote from George Ankner:
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!