M
Michel Walsh
Hi,
It seems you still miss the fundamental point that Access is NOT a
database engine and that JET is not more, not less, underlying to Access
than MS SQL Server actually is. Access and Jet, or MS SQL Server is like
Visual Studio 7.x with classical VC++, or Managed C++. There is nothing
underlying Access "exclusively", except by misconception (or wrong selection
of terms).
Who spoke ANY thing about adp? let see... the first newsgroup in
the list of newsgroups is anything but exactly that.
Vanderghast, Access MVP
It seems you still miss the fundamental point that Access is NOT a
database engine and that JET is not more, not less, underlying to Access
than MS SQL Server actually is. Access and Jet, or MS SQL Server is like
Visual Studio 7.x with classical VC++, or Managed C++. There is nothing
underlying Access "exclusively", except by misconception (or wrong selection
of terms).
Who spoke ANY thing about adp? let see... the first newsgroup in
the list of newsgroups is anything but exactly that.
Vanderghast, Access MVP
Frank Hickman said:Who said ANY thing about ADPs? Perhaps you should practice what you preach.
And as for the triggers, your correct that they can be created for SQL
Server which is NOT Access. Access's underlining database is Jet which does
NOT support triggers. Can we please drop it now?