K
krw
The plan is to charge my friends and associates one dollar per eye for
the test. After 25 such exams, I break even. I've done roughly the
same thing with loaning everything from garden machinery to computers.
Oddly, the $1 charge has dramatically improved my rate for returning
borrowed items over when I was doing it for free.
I guess I'd never consider charging friends. I generally loan them my
old tools (or HF's specifically bought for that purpose).
The PD numbers vary depending on who's doing the testing and what
device was used. In my case, I had it done 3 times at Costco and
twice at two different retail stores trying to sell me their
overpriced glasses. The basic instrument resolution and accuracy is
+/-0.5mm. I had PD totals varying over a 1.0mm range for distance,
and 1.5mm for reading. In one case, I had to explain to the lady at
Costco how to correctly operate the instrument. After buying the
close work glasses that didn't work, I went back to what I considered
to be the most competent retail store and essentially bribed them into
letting me use the pupilometer and extract my own numbers. That's
when I discovered that the sliders had some backlash. I ended up
generating two sets of numbers, coming from both directions, and
averaging the results. The store was very interested in what I was
doing and was quite happy to NOT sell me a pair of glasses as they
correctly assumed I would be an overly demanding customer.
Seems it's not _that_ important, then.
I think they care as nobody appeared to be negligent or intentionally
sloppy, just clueless. My guess(tm) is that they don't realize how
important the PD numbers are for high power glasses. They probably
dispense thousands of low power glasses that are deemed acceptable by
the customer. With higher power glasses, the customer probably
doesn't realize that their prescription could be improved by using a
proper PD. Since returning adult customers are probably not retested
on the pupilometer, once the wrong numbers are inscribed in the files,
they tend to be permanent, leaving the customer with no standards for
comparison.
Seems that would have been covered in their schooling. The ODs I've
used haven't been dummies.
What made me realize that things could be better was borrowing a trial
frame and lens kit for a week:
<http://www.ebay.com/itm/190718288464>
<http://www.ebay.com/itm/190710069079>
After some tinkering, I noticed that these glasses worked better than
my regular prescription glasses. I eventually determined that the
shopping mall optometrist, who decided that my eyes had changed over
the years from the original Kaiser exam and "adjusted" my
prescription, didn't do a very good job. I went to Costco for an eye
exam, and they compounded the error by analyzing my existing
prescription on a lensometer, and using that as a starting point.
That's standard practice and saves considerable time. The result was
very much like the "adjusted" prescription, which was wrong. I
eventually convinced Costco to do a retest, this time starting from
scratch, which resulted in a prescription that was much closer to the
20 year old original, and my tinkering with the trial lens kit.
If you want it done right, either watch the experts carefully, or do
as much as possible thyself. Either way, take some time to understand
how it all works and the processes that are involved.
I guess it would be more important if I were as blind as a bat. ;-) I
think these are only 2.5d in the uppers (the problem seems to be
mainly the astigmatism I picked up). I'd have to get out my
prescription, though.