Upgraded RAM Rating stayed the same

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neal
  • Start date Start date
The manager at my bank told me one day that they were debating not upgrading
from a 10mb to a 20mb hard drive because of the cost. After all, all they
ever ran on it was Lotus 1-2-3.
 
I think you need to plug the user into alternate slots and run dual channel.
:-) What are the top ratings, obviously I get a 5.9 for graphics (only 4.7
for games) on my old video card, so it goes over 5. Wonder what a new card
would run? What is the top rating for a given item.
 
I have not seen what the top rating might be. In the chat on the subject
over in TechBeta months ago the answer was that it was still in development.
 
Mario Rosario said:
Aaaaaagh! I remember paying $500 for 16 Megs of RAM. Back then
16 Megs was a lot. Maybe it was 64? I think I still have it
somewhere in a box.
2 GB is not a lot of RAM.

I paid about $600 for 16meg at Fry's way back when . I couldn't
wait to load it up so I could run the WinNT 3.1 beta!
 
I remember flipping switches on a Z80. I beleive the Z80 predates the Intel
4040.

Colin Barnhorst said:
My first home computer had 8k (not mb) of ram.
 
Sunnyvale Frys Baby!!!!!

4 GB of DDR 400 Ram is about $350!!! oh yeah!!!!
 
Correction it does not predate the 4040, it's compatable with the 8080.
 
Those were the days. I remember the endless poring through magazines trying
to find something to run on those machines. At the time the NorthStar
seemed like it was going to be the system to have. I never did.
 
I have running virtual machines, but never come close with anything else.
 
Nah Colin, I am not the least bit sorry that I'm using Vista.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaa.
 
Running 4GB($350) on an AMD 64 3800+($150) machine under Vista x64.

Have I "used" all 4 gigs? Have no idea, but since I am using it to tape the
World Cup games, while I watch taped shows on the same machine, have office
open, WIndows Mail, Deer Park Alpha 2, IE 32(for flash and ESPNSoccernet)
it makes it MUCH smoother than when I was doing that with 2GB. A lot less
hard drive thrashing. I often am doing something with photos or video, so
RAM is GOOOOOOD.
 
I think you need that 500Ghz IBM super computer that somebody mentioned on
here.
 
2.5GB DDR400 ram on a stock 2.8Ghz system comes in at a 4.2 rating for the
memory.
 
I would imagine that the bus speed is also a factor in the memory rating.
 
I'm sure you know what a bitblt is, but

Q: Do you know what a spltblt is?

A: The uneaten half of a sandwich.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top